The impact of using intranasal splints on morbidity and prevalence of adhesions

K A Al-Mazrou1, S M Zakzouk

  • 1ORL Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh 11622, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. kmazrou@ksu.edu.sa

Saudi Medical Journal
|August 2, 2001
PubMed

Insights

Intranasal splints did not significantly reduce adhesions but increased pain and crusting. Individualized use and nasal irrigation are recommended to manage potential morbidity from these devices.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Rhinology
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Adhesions and septal deviation are common complications following nasal surgery.
  • Intranasal splints are sometimes used to prevent these complications.
  • Assessing the morbidity associated with splint use is crucial for patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of intranasal splints in preventing adhesions post-surgery.
  • To determine the morbidity associated with the use of intranasal splints.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 114 patients across two tertiary hospitals (1988-1995).
  • Patients were divided into two groups: one with splints (10 days) and one without.
  • Outcomes measured included adhesions, perforation, bleeding, pain, crusting, and septum position.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in adhesion formation or septum medialization between groups.
  • Perforation rates were similar in both splinted and non-splinted groups.
  • Increased incidence of pain and crusting was observed in the splinted group (p<0.001).

Conclusions:

  • The routine use of intranasal splints may not be beneficial for adhesion prevention.
  • Individualized patient selection is advised for splint use.
  • Nasal irrigation is important for managing crusting and improving patient comfort.
Abstract