Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

10:24
Xenopus laevis as a Model to Identify Translation Impairment
Published on: September 27, 2015
eIF4G functionally differs from eIFiso4G in promoting internal initiation, cap-independent translation, and
1Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521-0129, USA. drgallie@citrus.ucr.edu
The Journal of Biological Chemistry
|August 3, 2001
Summary
Plant eukaryotic initiation factors (eIF) 4G and eIFiso4G show functional divergence. eIF4F preferentially translates structured and uncapped mRNAs, while eIFiso4F favors unstructured mRNAs.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Biochemistry
- Gene Expression Regulation
Background:
- Eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4G is crucial for ribosome binding to mRNA during translation initiation.
- Plants possess two eIF4G homologs, eIF4G and eIFiso4G, which form distinct complexes, eIF4F and eIFiso4F.
- These homologs share limited sequence identity, suggesting potential functional specialization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the functional differences between plant eIF4G and eIFiso4G proteins within their respective complexes (eIF4F and eIFiso4F).
- To determine how these complexes differentially regulate mRNA translation, particularly concerning mRNA structure and cap dependence.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of translation efficiency mediated by eIF4F and eIFiso4F.
- Assessment of 5'-cap dependency and poly(A)-binding protein requirement for translation.
- Testing translation of mRNAs with varying 5' secondary structures (unstructured vs. structured) and cap status (capped, uncapped, monocistronic, dicistronic).
Main Results:
- Both eIF4F and eIFiso4F require poly(A)-binding protein for optimal translation, with cap stimulation inversely correlated to complex concentration.
- While both complexes translate unstructured mRNAs, eIF4F significantly outperforms eIFiso4F in translating mRNAs with 5'-proximal secondary structures.
- eIF4F demonstrates a greater ability to stimulate translation from uncapped and multi-cistronic mRNAs compared to eIFiso4F.
Conclusions:
- Plant eIFiso4F and eIF4F have diverged functions in mRNA translation.
- eIFiso4F preferentially promotes translation of unstructured mRNAs.
- eIF4F exhibits broader translational capability, supporting structured, uncapped, and multi-cistronic mRNAs, potentially compensating for inhibited cap-dependent translation.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Initiation of Translation
Initiating translation is complex because it involves multiple molecules. Initiator tRNA, ribosomal subunits, and eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) are all required to assemble on the initiation codon of mRNA. This process consists of several steps that are mediated by different eIFs.
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
Regulated mRNA Transport
In eukaryotes, transcription and translation are compartmentalized; an mRNA is first synthesized in the nucleus and then selectively transported to the cytoplasm for protein synthesis. Before transport, a pre-mRNA undergoes several steps of post-transcriptional modifications including splicing, 5' capping, and the addition of a poly-adenine tail. Various proteins bind to the pre-mRNA during these modifications. The mRNA transport takes place with the help of multiple proteins playing specific...
Leaky Scanning
During most eukaryotic translation processes, the small 40S ribosome subunit scans an mRNA from its 5' end until it encounters the first start AUG codon. The large 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the smaller one to initiate protein synthesis. The location of the translation initiation is largely determined by the nucleotides near the start codon as there may be multiple translation initiation sites present on the mRNA. Marilyn Kozak discovered that the sequence RCCAUGG (where R stands for...
Initiation of Translation
Initiating translation is complex because it involves multiple molecules. Initiator tRNA, ribosomal subunits, and eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) are all required to assemble on the initiation codon of mRNA. This process consists of several steps that are mediated by different eIFs.
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
Translation in Prokaryotes
Prokaryote translation is a complex, highly coordinated process that converts genetic information from mRNA into functional proteins. It involves three stages: initiation, elongation, and termination, each facilitated by specific molecular components.Initiation of TranslationThe process begins with the assembly of the ribosomal subunits and initiation factors on the mRNA. In bacteria, the 30S ribosomal subunit recognizes the Shine-Dalgarno sequence in the mRNA, a conserved region upstream of...

