Related Experiment Videos
Xemilofiban/orbofiban: insight into drug development.
R Anders1, J Kleiman, N Nicholson
1Searle/Pharmacia Pharmaceuticals, 5200 Old Orchard Road, OO-II-3102, Skokie, IL 60077, USA. robert.j.anders@monsanto.com
Cardiovascular Drug Reviews
|August 3, 2001
Summary
Oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists like xemilofiban and orbofiban were evaluated for chronic use in unstable angina. Despite promising mechanisms, pivotal trials did not demonstrate significant clinical benefits.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Thrombosis
Background:
- Intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists show success in acute settings like unstable angina and percutaneous interventions.
- The potential for chronic platelet aggregation inhibition led to the development of oral agents for longer-term use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and evaluate the development programs of oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, specifically xemilofiban and orbofiban.
- To understand the selection process for therapeutic targets based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles.
- To analyze pivotal Phase III trial results and identify reasons for the lack of demonstrated benefit.
Main Methods:
- Review of development programs for xemilofiban and orbofiban.
- Analysis of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data.
- Evaluation of pivotal Phase III clinical trial outcomes.
Main Results:
- The development of oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists was explored for chronic administration in cardiovascular conditions.
- Pivotal Phase III trials for xemilofiban and orbofiban were conducted to assess efficacy and safety.
- These agents did not show significant clinical benefit in the trials reviewed.
Conclusions:
- Despite a strong theoretical basis and promising initial research, oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists did not translate into significant clinical benefits in Phase III trials.
- Further investigation into the complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses was insufficient to overcome the lack of efficacy.
- The development of these specific agents for chronic use in unstable angina was ultimately unsuccessful.