Related Experiment Videos
Reliability and validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test
1School of Rehabilitation Services, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
The Journal of Pediatrics
|August 7, 2001
Summary
The Harris Infant Neuromotor Test (HINT) reliably screens infant neuromotor skills in infants aged 3-12 months. It shows strong concurrent validity with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II, predicting motor outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Infant Assessment
Background:
- Early identification of neuromotor differences in infants is crucial for timely intervention.
- Existing screening tools may require significant time for administration and scoring.
- The Harris Infant Neuromotor Test (HINT) was developed as a rapid screening tool.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test (HINT).
- To determine HINT's effectiveness in identifying neuromotor differences in infants aged 3 to 12 months.
- To assess HINT's correlation with established developmental assessments.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 54 infants (3-12 months) from high-risk follow-up programs were assessed.
- Inter-rater, test-retest, and intra-rater reliability of the HINT were examined.
- Concurrent and predictive validity were assessed against the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID-II) using Pearson correlation.
Main Results:
- The HINT demonstrated excellent reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients for the Total HINT Score ranging from 0.98 to 0.99.
- Strong concurrent validity was found between HINT and BSID-II Mental (r = -0.73) and Motor Scales (r = -0.89) during the first year.
- Predictive validity showed moderate correlation with BSID-II Motor scores at 17-22 months (r = -0.49).
Conclusions:
- The HINT is a reliable screening tool for infant neuromotor performance.
- HINT exhibits strong concurrent validity with the Bayley-II Mental and Motor Scales.
- HINT scores in the first year explained 24% of the variance in later motor scores.