Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dose displays and record keeping.

K Faulkner1

  • 1Quality Assurance Reference Centre, Newcastle General Hospital, Westgate Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 6BE, UK. keith2@faulkner54.freeserve.co.uk

Radiation Protection Dosimetry
|August 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Public health promotion: the role of the dermatologist.

The British journal of dermatology·2015
Same author

Criteria and suspension levels in diagnostic radiology.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
Same author

The revision of RP 91 on criteria for acceptability of radiological (including radiotherapy) and nuclear medicine installations.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
Same author

Development of acceptability criteria in mammography.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
Same author

Cervical cancer incidence in young women: a historical and geographic controlled UK regional population study.

British journal of cancer·2012
Same author

A review of patient dose and optimisation methods in adult and paediatric CT scanning.

European journal of radiology·2011
Same journal

A proposal for a differentiated radiation protection program for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants compared to the operation of nuclear power plants.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

A three-dimensional neutron localization method based on double-scattering imaging and reconstruction algorithm.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Effect of 131I biodistribution on measurements using a scanning whole-body counter.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Activity concentration of 137Cs and natural radionuclides in soil around the Belarusian nuclear power plant in the pre-commissioning period.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Novel passive-adaptive exoskeleton-supported radiation protection equipment with enhanced shielding and reduced perceived weight.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Feasibility of kV dose measurement in IGRT using MV-calibrated ionization chambers.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
See all related articles

Patient dosimetry in interventional radiology is crucial for monitoring radiation exposure. Current systems lack displays for deterministic and non-deterministic effects, necessitating improved patient dose tracking and electronic record integration.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiology
  • Radiation Safety

Background:

  • Patient dosimetry is critical in digital diagnostic and interventional radiology.
  • Interventionalists require clear information on potential deterministic and non-deterministic radiation effects.
  • Current systems often fail to provide essential dosimetry data to interventionalists.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the need for improved displays of radiation dose information for interventionalists.
  • To emphasize the importance of accurate patient dosimetry for follow-up care.
  • To advocate for electronic integration of dosimetry data into Radiological Information Systems.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of interventionalist information needs regarding radiation effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of current dosimetry display limitations.
  • Proposal for electronic linking of dosimetry devices to patient records.
  • Main Results:

    • Interventionalists lack displays for likely skin effects (maximum estimated skin entrance dose) and non-deterministic effects (dose-area product).
    • This information gap leaves interventionalists unaware of potential radiological consequences.
    • There is a clear need for dosimetry data in patient records for follow-up.

    Conclusions:

    • Development of a patient dosimetry record minimum dataset is required.
    • Equipment connectivity standards are necessary for electronic integration.
    • Future systems should electronically link dosimetry devices to Radiological Information Systems for comprehensive patient dose management.