Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Requirements for demonstrating clinical efficacy: statistical aspects.

W Lehmacher

    Arbeiten Aus Dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt Fur Sera Und Impfstoffe) Zu Frankfurt A.M
    |August 8, 2001
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    First-Line Therapy for Patients With Multiple Myeloma: Direct and Indirect Comparison of Treatment Regimens on the Existing Market.

    Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2016
    Same author

    A 12-week DBPC dose-finding study with sublingual monomeric allergoid tablets in house dust mite-allergic patients.

    Allergy·2016
    Same author

    Letter to the editor: no increased febrile neutropenia risk to cancer patients receiving lipegfilgrastim--correction of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with G-CSF.

    Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2016
    Same author

    Drop the Likelihood Ratio. A Novel Non-electronic Tool for Interpreting Diagnostic Test Results.

    Methods of information in medicine·2015
    Same author

    Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study.

    Endoscopy·2013
    Same author

    Standards for subgroup analyses are needed?--we couldn't agree more.

    Journal of clinical epidemiology·2011
    Same journal

    Quality and clinical efficacy of allergen mixtures.

    Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M·2007
    Same journal

    A bright future for sublingual immunotherapy--contra.

    Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M·2007
    Same journal

    A bright future for sublingual immunotherapy?--pro.

    Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M·2007
    Same journal

    Recent advances in the use of genetically engineered negative signaling molecules to treat allergic diseases.

    Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M·2007
    Same journal

    Prospects for CpG based immunotherapy in asthma and allergy.

    Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M·2007
    Same journal

    Understanding the immunological basis of asthma; immunotherapy and regulatory T cells.

    Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M·2007
    See all related articles

    Statistical significance tests for comparing treatments often fail to show the effect

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Clinical Trial Analysis

    Background:

    • Traditional statistical inference for comparing two treatment effects relies heavily on significance testing.
    • Significance tests indicate whether an observed difference is likely due to chance but do not quantify the effect's magnitude.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the limitations of significance tests in clinical trial analysis.
    • To advocate for the use of confidence intervals for a more comprehensive understanding of treatment effects.
    • To discuss the advantages and applications of confidence intervals in demonstrating clinical efficacy.

    Main Methods:

    • Review and discussion of statistical inference methodologies.
    • Comparative analysis of significance tests versus confidence intervals.
    • Exploration of the utility of confidence intervals in clinical research.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Significance tests provide dichotomous outcomes (significant or not significant) without effect size.
    • In cases of non-significant results, significance tests cannot conclude the absence of a difference.
    • Confidence intervals offer a range of plausible values for the true effect size, aiding in efficacy assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Confidence intervals are superior to significance tests for evaluating clinical efficacy.
    • The magnitude and precision of treatment effects are better conveyed by confidence intervals.
    • Confidence intervals provide more informative data for clinical decision-making.