Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical practice guidelines: when the tool becomes the rule.

M J Long1

  • 1Department of Public Health Sciences, Wichita University, Kansas 67260-0152, USA.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|August 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The analysis and interpretation of seedling recruitment curves.

The American naturalist·2009
Same author

Quantitative trait loci for callus initiation and totipotency in maize (Zea mays L.).

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2006
Same author

Does the valve regulated release of urine from the bladder decrease encrustation and blockage of indwelling catheters by crystalline proteus mirabilis biofilms?

The Journal of urology·2004
Same author

What price an additional day of life? A cost-effectiveness study of case management.

The American journal of managed care·2001
Same author

The relationship of impending death and age category to treatment intensity in the elderly.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2000
Same author

Case management of the elderly in a health maintenance organization: the implications for program administration under managed care.

Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives·2000
Same journal

Evaluating Restraint and Seclusion as Care Processes Rather Than Compliance Metrics.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Burden in Informal Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients With Pressure Injuries: Perceived Social Support and Influencing Factors Care Burden in Palliative Caregivers.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Organisational Problems, Role Stress, and Job Satisfaction Among Emergency Department Workers: A Multicenter Mixed-Effects Study.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Highlighting a Systemic Bias in the Responder Odds Ratio.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Epistemological Issues in Clinical Reasoning: A Scoping Review.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
See all related articles

Clinical practice guidelines should not solely rely on central tendency measures for individual performance evaluation. Performance should be assessed within derived distribution tolerances, not against an average, to ensure quality and valid outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Measurement
  • Clinical Performance Assessment
  • Medical Guideline Utilization

Background:

  • Clinical practice guidelines are widely used for performance measurement.
  • Current methods often rely on central tendency, which may misrepresent individual performance.
  • Translating collective guidelines into individual performance metrics presents challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the use of clinical practice guidelines for individual performance measurement.
  • To address issues with using central tendency measures derived from performance distributions.
  • To explore the translation of guidelines into effective measurement instruments.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of existing performance measurement methodologies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the statistical properties of performance distributions.
  • Conceptual exploration of guideline implementation in performance assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Measures of central tendency may not accurately reflect individual performance.
    • Accepting low variation as a quality standard risks ignoring process-outcome linkages.
    • Including input measures in both dependent and independent variables creates tautological analyses.

    Conclusions:

    • Individual performance should be evaluated within the tolerances of its derived distribution.
    • Performance should not be rigidly held to a central tendency measure.
    • Alternative evaluation methods include using central tendency with standard deviation limits.