Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Future directions in dialysis quantification.

R M Lindsay1, J Sternby

  • 1Optimal Dialysis Research Unit, London Health Sciences Centre, Westminster Campus, 800 Commissioners Road E., London, Ontario N6A 4G5, Canada. robert.lindsay@lhsc.on.ca

Seminars in Dialysis
|August 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ECG machine QTc intervals are inaccurate in hemodialysis patients.

Nephron. Clinical practice·2013
Same author

The neurotrophin family of NGF-related neurotrophic factors.

Restorative neurology and neuroscience·2011
Same author

Technical aspects of home hemodialysis.

Saudi journal of kidney diseases and transplantation : an official publication of the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Saudi Arabia·2009
Same author

Association of intradialytic blood pressure changes with hospitalization and mortality rates in prevalent ESRD patients.

Kidney international·2007
Same author

On-line optical sensing of blood volume changes to prevent intradialytic hypovolemia.

CANNT journal = Journal ACITN·2005
Same author

CQI: hemodialysis vascular access flow monitoring.

CANNT journal = Journal ACITN·2005

Real-time dialysis monitoring using dialysate urea or conductivity measurements offers superior quantification over traditional blood sampling. These advanced methods provide accurate, continuous data for optimizing dialysis dose and assessing treatment adequacy.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Dialysis prescription relies on urea clearance (Kt/V), typically measured indirectly via blood samples.
  • Post-dialysis blood sampling is affected by urea rebound, limiting accuracy.
  • Current methods provide indirect measures of dialysis quantification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore real-time dialysis monitoring techniques for improved urea kinetic modeling.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of on-line urea monitoring and conductivity measurements for dialysis quantification.
  • To compare direct dialysate measurements with traditional blood-based methods.

Main Methods:

  • Real-time on-line urea monitoring using urease action and ammonium ion measurement (electrode or conductivity).
  • On-line clearance assessment using surrogate molecules (e.g., sodium chloride) via conductivity measurements.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Dialysate-side monitoring for parameters like whole-body Kt/V and pretreatment urea mass.

    • Main Results:

    • On-line monitoring allows for real-time urea kinetic modeling (Kt/V, nPCR).
    • Conductivity measurements provide effective urea clearance, accounting for recirculation.
    • Dialysate-side monitoring offers additional parameters for adequacy assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Real-time dialysate monitoring offers superior, direct measures for dialysis quantification.
    • Conductivity-based clearance is a cost-effective, robust method for assessing dialysis dose (Kxt).
    • Combining urea and conductivity monitoring enhances parameter derivation and treatment assessment.