Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Health state values from multiattribute utility instruments need correction.

E Nord1

  • 1National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. erik.nord@folkehelsa.no

Annals of Medicine
|August 9, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Evaluation of Economic Methods to Assess the Social Value of Medical Interventions for Ultra-Rare Disorders (URDS).

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2016
Same author

Severity of illness versus expected benefit in societal evaluation of healthcare interventions.

Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research·2009
Same author

Towards cost-value analysis in health care?

Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy·2005
Same author

Insulin lispro therapy in pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Diabetes research and clinical practice·2002
Same author

The desirability of a condition versus the well being and worth of a person.

Health economics·2001
Same author

Cost-utility analysis of high-dose melphalan with autologous blood stem cell support vs. melphalan plus prednisone in patients younger than 60 years with multiple myeloma.

European journal of haematology·2001
Same journal

Early metabolic trajectory and sedation strategy in V-V ECMO for severe pneumonia: a multicenter cohort study.

Annals of medicine·2026
Same journal

Analysis of the current status and influencing factors of influenza vaccination among medical staff in multiple regions of China.

Annals of medicine·2026
Same journal

Predictive value of gastrointestinal decompression volume and its trajectory over time for surgical intervention in children with postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Annals of medicine·2026
Same journal

Effects of blood flow restriction training combined with resistance training on lower-limb strength and sport-specific performance in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Annals of medicine·2026
Same journal

Association between maternal serum RANKL and adverse birth outcomes: a prospective cohort study.

Annals of medicine·2026
Same journal

<i>Helicobacter pylori</i> in oral and gastric pathologies: a narrative review of potential bidirectional pathogenic interactions.

Annals of medicine·2026
See all related articles

Cost-utility analysis measures health intervention benefits using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A new cost-value analysis approach transforms QALYs, prioritizing the worst-off, enhancing economic evaluations.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Decision Science
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is a standard method for assessing health intervention value.
  • Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is the primary metric in CUA, ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health).
  • Multiattribute utility (MAU) instruments are commonly used to derive QALY scores.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a refined approach to economic evaluation in healthcare.
  • To enhance CUA by incorporating societal concerns for equity.
  • To provide a method for transforming utility scores to reflect priority for the worst-off.

Main Methods:

  • Conventional cost-utility analysis using standard MAU instrument outputs.
  • Cost-value analysis (CVA) involving transformation of utility scores.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a preliminary figure to guide utility score transformations for equity considerations.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstration of two distinct analytical approaches: conventional CUA and the broader CVA.
    • Introduction of a method to adjust QALYs for equity, prioritizing disadvantaged populations.
    • Presentation of a tool to facilitate the practical application of CVA.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed cost-value analysis offers a more comprehensive framework for health economic evaluation.
    • Transforming QALYs can better align health intervention assessments with societal values, particularly equity.
    • The presented figure serves as a practical aid for researchers implementing cost-value analysis.