Dynamic in vivo interactions among Myc network members

X Yin1, M F Landay, W Han

  • 1Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, PA 15213, USA.

Oncogene
|August 11, 2001
PubMed

Insights

The Myc oncoprotein network proteins form dynamic structures within the nucleus. c-Myc and Max heterodimers, but not Max-Mad, localize to active transcription sites, suggesting novel regulatory roles.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Oncogenesis

Background:

  • The Myc oncoprotein network, including c-Myc, Max, and Mad proteins, is crucial for cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis.
  • Understanding the subnuclear localization and dynamics of these proteins is key to elucidating their regulatory functions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the subnuclear localization and dynamics of Myc network proteins (c-Myc, Max, Mad1, Mxi1) in fibroblasts.
  • To determine the functional significance of their subnuclear organization and heterodimerization on transcriptional regulation.

Main Methods:

  • Expression of chimeric green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions of c-Myc, Max, and Mad proteins in fibroblasts.
  • Subnuclear localization studies using fluorescence microscopy.
  • Deletion mapping to identify domains responsible for nuclear localization and speckling.
  • Co-expression experiments to assess heterodimerization effects on localization.

Main Results:

  • Individually, c-Myc and Mad proteins localized to subnuclear speckles, while Max showed a homogeneous nuclear pattern.
  • Protein distributions were co-dominant and dynamic, adopting the pattern of the heterodimeric partner upon co-expression.
  • Domains for nuclear localization and speckling were separable in Mad proteins (Mad1, Mxi1).
  • A non-speckling Mxi1 mutant exhibited reduced transcriptional repressor activity.
  • c-Myc-Max heterodimers, unlike Max-Mad, co-localized with SC-35 domains involved in mRNA processing.

Conclusions:

  • Myc network proteins form dynamic subnuclear structures that are influenced by heterodimerization.
  • c-Myc-Max heterodimers associate with active pre-mRNA transcription/processing sites, suggesting a role in transcriptional activation.
  • Max-Mad heterodimers do not show this association, implying distinct regulatory mechanisms for repression.

Related Concept Videos

Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways01:19

Interactions Between Signaling Pathways

Signaling cascades usually lack linearity. Multiple pathways interact and regulate one another, allowing cells to integrate and respond to diverse environmental stimuli.
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
Microbial Interactions: Mutualism01:25

Microbial Interactions: Mutualism

Mutualism is a symbiotic interaction in which all participating organisms benefit. These relationships can be obligate or facultative and are fundamental to ecosystem functions across diverse biological systems.Plant–Fungi MutualismOne well-known example is the association between plant roots and mycorrhizal fungi, such as Rhizophagus species. The fungal hyphae penetrate the root hairs and the epidermis, forming an extensive hyphal network that establishes a symbiotic association. Through this...
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation01:26

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation

Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...
Microbial Interactions: Competition01:26

Microbial Interactions: Competition

Microbial competition is an ecological interaction in which microorganisms vie for limited resources within shared environments. These resources may include nutrients, space, or light, depending on the system. The intensity and outcome of competition are influenced by the environmental context, such as nutrient availability, spatial constraints, and the diversity of microbial species present. These competitive interactions significantly influence the structure, function, and resilience of...