Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Focus Formation: A Cell-based Assay to Determine the Oncogenic Potential of a Gene
Published on: December 31, 2014
Dynamic in vivo interactions among Myc network members
X Yin1, M F Landay, W Han
1Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, PA 15213, USA.
The Myc oncoprotein network proteins form dynamic structures within the nucleus. c-Myc and Max heterodimers, but not Max-Mad, localize to active transcription sites, suggesting novel regulatory roles.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Biology
- Oncogenesis
Background:
- The Myc oncoprotein network, including c-Myc, Max, and Mad proteins, is crucial for cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis.
- Understanding the subnuclear localization and dynamics of these proteins is key to elucidating their regulatory functions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the subnuclear localization and dynamics of Myc network proteins (c-Myc, Max, Mad1, Mxi1) in fibroblasts.
- To determine the functional significance of their subnuclear organization and heterodimerization on transcriptional regulation.
Main Methods:
- Expression of chimeric green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions of c-Myc, Max, and Mad proteins in fibroblasts.
- Subnuclear localization studies using fluorescence microscopy.
- Deletion mapping to identify domains responsible for nuclear localization and speckling.
- Co-expression experiments to assess heterodimerization effects on localization.
Main Results:
- Individually, c-Myc and Mad proteins localized to subnuclear speckles, while Max showed a homogeneous nuclear pattern.
- Protein distributions were co-dominant and dynamic, adopting the pattern of the heterodimeric partner upon co-expression.
- Domains for nuclear localization and speckling were separable in Mad proteins (Mad1, Mxi1).
- A non-speckling Mxi1 mutant exhibited reduced transcriptional repressor activity.
- c-Myc-Max heterodimers, unlike Max-Mad, co-localized with SC-35 domains involved in mRNA processing.
Conclusions:
- Myc network proteins form dynamic subnuclear structures that are influenced by heterodimerization.
- c-Myc-Max heterodimers associate with active pre-mRNA transcription/processing sites, suggesting a role in transcriptional activation.
- Max-Mad heterodimers do not show this association, implying distinct regulatory mechanisms for repression.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
Microbial Interactions: Mutualism
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation
Microbial Interactions: Competition

