Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Principles of screening.

M I Evans1, E L Krivchenia

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Fetal Therapy Program, MCP Hahnemann University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Clinics in Perinatology
|August 14, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cell-free fetal DNA screening in the USA: a cost analysis of screening strategies.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2014
Same author

Impact of nuchal translucency credentialing by the FMF, the NTQR or both on screening distributions and performance.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2011
Same author

Chlamydia trachomatis: a practical obstetric/gynecologic management approach.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2010
Same author

Peeling back the onion on ultrasound abnormalities.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2009
Same author

Second-trimester sonographic soft markers: what can we learn from the experience of first-trimester nuchal translucency screening?

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2008
Same author

Anxiety among women who have undergone fertility therapy and who are considering multifetal pregnancy reduction: trends and implications.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians·2003

Screening tests identify high-risk individuals from low-risk populations, unlike diagnostic tests that provide definitive answers. Understanding this distinction is crucial for effective clinical practice and patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Medicine
  • Diagnostic and Screening Technologies

Background:

  • Screening test principles have evolved over decades.
  • Distinguishing screening from diagnostic tests is essential for clinicians.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the fundamental differences between screening and diagnostic tests.
  • To emphasize the role of screening in risk stratification within a population.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of screening and diagnostic test methodologies.
  • Review of established clinical guidelines and principles.

Main Results:

  • Screening tests are designed to identify individuals at higher risk within a broader population.
  • Diagnostic tests aim to confirm or rule out a specific condition in symptomatic or higher-risk individuals.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

  • Clinicians must differentiate between screening tests for risk identification and diagnostic tests for definitive answers.
  • Proper application of screening tests aids in early detection and targeted interventions.