Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating the evidence for hormesis: a statistical perspective.

K Crump1

  • 1ICF Consulting, Ruston, LA 71270, USA. kennycrump@icfconsulting.com

Critical Reviews in Toxicology
|August 16, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The use of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy to provide post-operative analgesia in the dog.

Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia·2017
Same author

Lung cancer mortality among chromate production workers.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2003
Same author

Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.

Toxicology and industrial health·2002
Same author

Modeling lung cancer risk from diesel exhaust: suitability of the railroad worker cohort for quantitative risk assessment.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2001
Same author

Reanalysis of dose-response data from the Iraqi methylmercury poisoning episode.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·1995
Same author

Death following colchicine poisoning.

Journal of forensic sciences·1994
Same journal

Microplastic trafficking in maternal-fetal system: a systematic review and quantitative profiling linking particle characteristics to developmental biology.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same journal

Addendum.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same journal

Inhalation exposure and health effects of copper particles in the context of occupational exposure limit derivation.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same journal

Screening for the ovarian toxicity of industrial chemicals - ovarian follicles and corpora lutea counts in rats, an inter- and intra-laboratory comparison.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of the modes of action for key noncancer effects of 1,3-Butadiene: input from an independent expert panel to support derivation of data-derived extrapolation factors.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same journal

The effect of antioxidants on antineoplastic-induced male reproductive system damage: a systematic review of experimental studies.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
See all related articles

Hormesis, a beneficial low-dose effect, is difficult to include in risk assessments. Modifying guidelines to assume hormesis could improve its regulatory consideration, but more data and statistical methods are needed.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Hormesis describes a biphasic dose-response where low doses are beneficial and high doses are toxic.
  • Current regulatory guidelines present challenges for incorporating hormesis into risk assessments.
  • Difficulty in gathering sufficient evidence for hormesis hinders its acceptance in individual cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of accounting for hormesis within existing regulatory frameworks.
  • To explore the conditions under which hormesis could be more readily incorporated into agency risk assessments.
  • To identify limitations in current data and statistical methods for assessing hormesis prevalence.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current regulatory guidelines and risk assessment procedures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of existing evidence for hormesis across various situations.
  • Evaluation of statistical approaches for determining the prevalence of hormesis.

    • Main Results:

    • Incorporating hormesis requires departing from default risk assessment procedures, which is challenging due to evidence requirements.
    • Hormesis is unlikely to be a significant factor in current risk assessments unless guidelines are modified.
    • Existing data is insufficient to determine the overall prevalence of hormesis due to methodological limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • Regulatory guidelines may need modification to default to hormesis if it's a widespread phenomenon.
    • A lack of valid statistical tests and inadequate control for false positives limit current prevalence estimates.
    • Developing a comprehensive database and improved statistical analyses are crucial for better understanding hormesis prevalence.