Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

Procedures for Identifying Infectious Prions After Passage Through the Digestive System of an Avian Species
Published on: November 6, 2013
Health protocol for translocation of free-ranging elk
1Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA. jcorn@vet.uga.edu
Wildlife managers must assess health risks when translocating elk (Cervus elaphus). This protocol evaluates infectious agents and parasites, classifying them by risk to reduce disease introduction during restoration programs.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Medicine
- Wildlife Ecology
- Conservation Biology
Background:
- Elk (Cervus elaphus) restoration programs often involve translocation, necessitating a thorough evaluation of potential health risks.
- Movement of free-ranging elk from western North America to the southeastern USA presents unique challenges regarding infectious agents and ectoparasites.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a protocol for assessing health considerations associated with elk translocation.
- To evaluate infectious agents and ectoparasites for their potential to be introduced and established in new environments.
- To assess pathological consequences for elk, other wildlife, domestic animals, and humans.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative risk assessment using selected epidemiologic factors to estimate agent introduction and establishment potential.
- Literature review and expert consultation to assess pathological consequences of high-risk agents.
- Classification of infectious agents and ectoparasites into low, unknown, and high-risk categories.
Main Results:
- 174 agents classified as low risk, 10 as unknown risk, and 9 as high risk.
- Specific agents like Anaplasma spp., Mycobacterium paratuberculosis, and Echinococcus granulosus were classified as unknown risk.
- High-risk agents included the agent of chronic wasting disease, Brucella abortus, Mycobacterium bovis, and specific ticks and mites.
- Endemic parasites in the southeastern USA pose a "reverse risk" to translocated elk.
Conclusions:
- A five-component protocol was developed to mitigate the introduction of high-risk infectious agents and ectoparasites.
- Protocol components include source population health evaluation, quarantine, diagnostics, translocation restrictions, and prophylactic treatment.
- This risk-based approach is crucial for successful and safe elk restoration programs.
More Related Videos
09:09Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
05:27Immunization of Alpacas (Lama pacos) with Protein Antigens and Production of Antigen-specific Single Domain Antibodies
Published on: January 26, 2019