Related Experiment Videos
Life-threatening illness in the analyst
1Chicago Institute for Psychoanalysis, USA. Fajardo@mindspring.com
Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
|August 18, 2001
Summary
Practicing psychotherapy during a life-threatening illness requires careful consideration of therapist self-disclosure, informed by "one-body" versus "two-body" transference perspectives. Effective practice involves distinct phases and necessitates supervisory support for ethical decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Psychotherapy
- Psychoanalysis
Background:
- Review of literature on therapists practicing during life-threatening illnesses.
- Exploration of differing attitudes toward therapist self-disclosure.
- Introduction of "one-body" and "two-body" perspectives on transference.
Observation:
- Therapist self-disclosure is influenced by the emphasis on transference interpretation versus patient needs within the therapeutic alliance.
- Clinical vignettes illustrate themes from the author's experience practicing during a life-threatening illness.
- Three distinct phases of therapeutic work during illness are identified, each with unique demands on the therapist and patient.
Findings:
- The therapist's internal state significantly impacts patient needs and reactions during different phases of illness.
- Effective practice during a life-threatening illness is contingent upon specific conditions.
- Supervisory support is crucial for therapists navigating clinical and ethical decisions, especially when facing terminal illness.
Implications:
- Understanding transference perspectives is key to managing self-disclosure in therapy.
- Therapists require robust support systems, including personal analysis, to manage the complexities of practicing during severe illness.
- Ethical and clinical decision-making is paramount for therapists facing their own mortality or serious health challenges.