Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interactions between P300 and passive probe responses differ in different visual cortical areas.

A Michalski1

  • 1Department of Neurophysiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, 3 Pasteur St., 02-093 Warsaw, Poland. michan@nencki.gov.pl.

Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis
|August 22, 2001
PubMed
Summary

The P300 potential suppresses responses to irrelevant stimuli in visual and parietal cortex. However, frontal areas may delay rather than suppress these responses, aiding information processing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Maternal periconceptional exposure to drinking water disinfection by-products and neural tube defects in offspring.

Birth defects research·2024
Same author

The molecular landscape and associated clinical experience in infant medulloblastoma: prognostic significance of second-generation subtypes.

Neuropathology and applied neurobiology·2020
Same author

Self-Assembly of Triblock Copolymers from Cyclic Esters as a Tool for Tuning Their Particle Morphology.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2018
Same author

Reply to Comment on: The UK Experience of a Treatment Strategy for Pediatric Metastatic Medulloblastoma Comprising Intensive Induction Chemotherapy, Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy, and Response-Directed High-Dose Myeloablative Chemotherapy or Maintenance Chemotherapy (Milan Strategy).

Pediatric blood & cancer·2016
Same author

A microfluidic device for real-time monitoring of Bacillus subtilis bacterial spores during germination based on non-specific physicochemical interactions on the nanoscale level.

Lab on a chip·2014
Same author

Effect of cross-linking degree on selected properties of retrograded starch adipate.

Food chemistry·2014

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • The P300 component in human event-related potentials is theorized to involve firing threshold regulation in cortical neurons.
  • This regulation hypothesis suggests that detecting important stimuli inhibits irrelevant neural networks, facilitating focused information analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of the P300 potential in modulating visual cortex responsiveness.
  • To examine how probing stimuli are processed during the P300 potential, differentiating early and late processing stages.

Main Methods:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from scalp sites (Fz, Cz, Pz, Oz) during an odd-ball task.
  • Visual probe stimuli were presented at various intervals (200-1000 ms) after target stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Cortical visual field separation allowed for distinct analysis of input and advanced processing stages.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant suppression of probe responses was observed in occipital (Oz) and parietal (Pz) sites for probes presented within 400 ms of target stimuli.
    • No suppression was found in frontal (Cz, Fz) sites; instead, probe response latencies were elongated.
    • The degree of suppression in Oz and Pz was not proportional to the initial voltage levels of probe responses.

    Conclusions:

    • The P300 potential actively suppresses neural responses to irrelevant stimuli in posterior cortical areas (occipital, parietal).
    • In contrast, frontal cortical areas (Fz, Cz) appear to delay rather than suppress responses to irrelevant stimuli during the P300 potential.
    • These findings suggest a differential processing mechanism across cortical regions, where frontal areas might facilitate information analysis by delaying, not inhibiting, irrelevant input processing.