Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Data Validation

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...

Data Validation

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

Contaminants and Errors

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

"So you think I'll survive?": a qualitative study about doctor-patient dialogues preceding high-risk cardiac surgery or intervention.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2009

Same author

"If you cannot tolerate that risk, you should never become a physician": a qualitative study about existential experiences among physicians.

Journal of medical ethics·2008

Same author

[Better health services for lesbian women].

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2002

Same author

From exercise and education to movement and interaction. Treatment groups in primary care for women with chronic muscular pain.

Scandinavian journal of primary health care·2002

Same author

[A shared room of reflection where the patient's symptoms are valid sources of knowledge].

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2002

Same author

[Subjective symptoms without objective findings--a challenge for theory and practice of general medicine].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2002

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility

Published on: August 8, 2014

Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.

¹Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Ulriksdal 8C, N-5009, Bergen, Norway. kirsti.malterud@isf.uib.no

Lancet (London, England)

|August 22, 2001

Summary

Qualitative research methods enhance medical understanding by complementing quantitative approaches. Key standards like relevance, validity, and reflexivity are crucial for rigorous qualitative inquiry in medicine.

More Related Videos

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility

Published on: August 8, 2014

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Area of Science:

Medical research methodology
Qualitative inquiry in healthcare

Background:

Qualitative research offers valuable insights into medicine.
Traditionally viewed as separate, qualitative and quantitative methods are complementary.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose relevance, validity, and reflexivity as overarching standards for qualitative research in medicine.
To address challenges in qualitative medical research, including reflexivity, transferability, and interpretation.

Main Methods:

Discussion of qualitative research principles.
Exploration of challenges specific to medical researchers using qualitative methods.
Proposal of guidelines for conducting qualitative inquiry in medicine.

Main Results:

Relevance, validity, and reflexivity are identified as key standards for qualitative research.
Specific challenges in medical qualitative research are highlighted.
Guidelines for enhancing qualitative inquiry in medicine are proposed.

Conclusions:

Qualitative and quantitative research methods can be integrated effectively in medical research.
Establishing clear standards and guidelines improves the rigor and applicability of qualitative medical research.