Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Continuous processing in macaque frontal cortex during visual search.

N P Bichot1, S Chenchal Rao, J D Schall

  • 1Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 301 Wilson Hall, 111 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.

Neuropsychologia
|August 23, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dopamine and beta-band oscillations differentially link to striatal value and motor control.

Science advances·2020
Same author

Comparative diffusion tractography of corticostriatal motor pathways reveals differences between humans and macaques.

Journal of neurophysiology·2015
Same author

Dynamics of saccade target selection: race model analysis of double step and search step saccade production in human and macaque.

Vision research·2007
Same author

Correlates of motor planning and postsaccadic fixation in the macaque monkey lateral geniculate nucleus.

Experimental brain research·2005
Same author

Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Dynamic dissociation of visual selection from saccade programming in frontal eye field.

Journal of neurophysiology·2001
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

From Past Recall to Future Projection: What Does Verb Tense Production Reveal About Mental Time Travel in Alzheimer's disease?

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

Information processing in the brain occurs continuously, not in discrete steps. Neuronal activity in macaque monkeys showed that even incorrect visual stimuli influenced response preparation, supporting continuous information transfer models.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurophysiology

Background:

  • Mental chronometry investigates information transfer between cognitive stages.
  • Continuous vs. discrete processing models are central to this debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if partial stimulus information affects response preparation.
  • To differentiate between continuous and discrete information processing models.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded movement-related neuron activity in the frontal eye field of macaque monkeys.
  • Monkeys performed conjunction and feature visual search tasks with distractors.

Main Results:

  • Movement-related neurons activated for both targets and distractors.
  • Distractor activation varied based on its properties (e.g., shared features, previous targets).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Neuron activation correlated with distractor salience, even when a correct saccade was made.

    • Conclusions:

    • Findings support a continuous information processing model.
    • Evidence argues against strictly discrete models of stimulus evaluation and response preparation.