Related Experiment Videos
Optimum mating systems for the myostatin locus in cattle
1USDA, ARS, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166, USA. keele@email.marc.usda.gov
Journal of Animal Science
|August 24, 2001
Summary
Inactive myostatin increases muscularity and lean growth but can reduce quality grade. Strategic mating systems can optimize profits by balancing these genetic traits with market prices for beef.
Area of Science:
- Animal Genetics and Breeding
- Beef Production Systems
- Quantitative Genetics
Background:
- Inactive myostatin alleles (one or two copies) are associated with increased muscularity, lean yield, and growth efficiency in cattle.
- These genetic variations can lead to reduced fat content and quality grade (marbling), but do not negatively impact meat tenderness.
- Potential disadvantages like reduced quality grade and increased dystocia necessitate exploring optimized breeding strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a robust method for comparing the economic viability of different mating systems for cattle with varying myostatin genotypes.
- To identify optimal breeding strategies that maximize profitability by leveraging the benefits of inactive myostatin while mitigating its drawbacks.
Main Methods:
- Economic modeling incorporating variables such as retail product prices across USDA quality grades (Standard, Select, Choice), assisted calving costs, and genotyping expenses.
- Analysis of seven distinct mating systems designed to maximize profit under diverse combinations of biological parameters and economic conditions.
- Simulation of profitability based on varying market prices for different beef quality grades.
Main Results:
- Inactive myostatin use is profitable when Select grade prices are at least 80% of Choice, and Standard grade prices are at least 60% of Choice.
- Profitability increases for mating systems favoring inactive myostatin alleles as Select and Standard grade prices approach Choice grade prices.
- Seven unique mating systems were identified, each optimal for specific economic and biological parameter combinations, demonstrating no single universal best system.
Conclusions:
- Profitable implementation of inactive myostatin genetics requires either retaining beef ownership through fabrication or developing niche markets that prioritize lean yield over marbling.
- Strategic mating systems are crucial for maximizing the economic benefits of inactive myostatin alleles in beef production.
- The economic feasibility of inactive myostatin is sensitive to market price differentials between beef quality grades.