Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Self-esteem and outcome fairness: differential importance of procedural and outcome considerations
R Vermunt1, D van Knippenberg, B van Knippenberg
1Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands. vermunt@fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Abstract:
Results of a survey of 222 detainees in Dutch jails and police stations showed that outcome-fairness judgments of individuals with high self-esteem were more strongly related to outcome considerations than to procedural considerations, whereas outcome-fairness judgments of individuals with low self-esteem were more strongly related to procedural considerations than to outcome considerations. It was proposed that these differences were due to the fact that (a) procedures more strongly express a social evaluation than outcomes and (b) individuals with low self-esteem are more concerned with social evaluations than individuals with high self-esteem. The implications of the results for other individual-differences factors and other populations than detainees are discussed.
More Related Videos
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Protecting Self-Esteem
Equity Theory