Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differential activation solution to the motion correspondence problem.

L A Gilroy1, H S Hock, A Ploeger

  • 1Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton 33431, USA.

Perception & Psychophysics
|August 28, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alternative processes in the identification of familiar pictures.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Individual differences in the verbal coding of familiar visual stimuli.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Dichoptic plaids may rival, but their motions can integrate.

Spatial vision·2001
Same author

Bistability in the perception of motion and stationarity: effects of temporal asymmetry.

Perception & psychophysics·1999
Same author

Attentional control of spatial scale: effects on self-organized motion patterns.

Vision research·1999
Same author

Temporal organization in children's strategy formation.

Journal of experimental child psychology·1998
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Visual motion perception relies on how directionally selective motion detectors activate, not just element proximity. This differential activation model explains motion correspondence and perception, even for simultaneous, multi-directional movements.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The correspondence problem in motion perception occurs when visual elements have multiple possible motion paths.
  • Ullman's minimal mapping theory assigns costs based on element affinities (e.g., distance) to solve this.
  • An alternative solution involves the differential activation of directionally selective motion detectors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To distinguish between Ullman's minimal mapping theory and a differential activation account of motion perception.
  • To investigate the role of detector activation in solving the motion correspondence problem.
  • To explore how path length and luminance affect motion perception.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental manipulation of path length and luminance in visual motion paradigms.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measuring the activation of directionally selective motion detectors.
  • Comparing experimental results with predictions from minimal mapping theory and differential activation theory.

    • Main Results:

    • Path length affects motion detector activation even when correspondence is not a factor.
    • Detector activation successfully predicts luminance effects on motion correspondence.
    • Perception of simultaneous, bi-directional motion depends on detector activation thresholds, not path-length affinity matching.

    Conclusions:

    • The differential activation of motion detectors, rather than minimal mapping, better explains solutions to the motion correspondence problem.
    • This model has implications for the stability and adaptation of perceived motion.
    • Understanding detector activation is key to understanding complex motion perception.