Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Promoting sun safety among zoo visitors.

J A Mayer1, E C Lewis, L Eckhardt

  • 1Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, California 92182-4162, USA. jmayer@mail.sdsu.edu

Preventive Medicine
|August 28, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for Light Pseudoscalar Bosons, Pair-Produced in Higgs Boson Decays in the Four-Electron Final State in Proton-Proton Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Evidence for Mixing-Induced CP Violation in B_{s}^{0}→J/ψϕ(1020) Decays in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Observation of Suppressed Charged-Particle Production in Ultrarelativistic Oxygen-Oxygen Collisions.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Measurement of D^{0} Meson Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Heavy Ion Collisions.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Observation of tWZ Production at the CMS Experiment.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Exclusive Reconstruction of the B^{*+}, B^{*0}, and B_{s}^{*0} Mesons and Precise Measurement of Their Masses.

Physical review letters·2026

Researchers tested a program at zoos to encourage parents and children to protect themselves from sun damage. The program included educational tips, activities, and discounts on sun-safe gear. While the intervention successfully boosted sales of sunscreen and hats, its ability to increase the actual wearing of hats by children remained unclear.

Area of Science:

  • Public health interventions within ultraviolet radiation protection research
  • Behavioral science applications in zoological park settings

Background:

Public health experts lack sufficient data regarding effective strategies to minimize skin damage for families visiting outdoor recreational venues. Millions of young people experience prolonged exposure to solar rays while touring animal exhibits annually. Prior research has shown that consistent protective behaviors remain low among visitors in these environments. No prior work had resolved how to best influence parental purchasing habits for sun-safe products during leisure time. That uncertainty drove the need to test comprehensive behavioral programs in real-world settings. Previous efforts often focused on clinical environments rather than informal educational spaces. This gap motivated the current investigation into practical solutions for outdoor safety. The authors sought to address these challenges by implementing a multi-faceted approach at zoological parks across different seasons.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study was to evaluate an intervention designed to reduce exposure to solar rays among families visiting zoological parks. Researchers sought to determine if a multicomponent program could effectively change sun-safe behaviors in outdoor recreational settings. They addressed the problem of high ultraviolet radiation exposure for children during long visits to animal exhibits. The motivation for this work stemmed from the need to improve protective practices in informal environments. No prior work had resolved whether financial incentives and educational materials could influence purchasing habits in these locations. That uncertainty drove the authors to test their program across different seasons to ensure robust findings. The team hypothesized that combining prompts with discounts would increase the usage of protective gear. This investigation provides insights into the feasibility of implementing health-promoting strategies in busy public venues.

Keywords:
skin protectionrecreational healthpublic health educationconsumer behavior

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers observed that the intervention increased sunscreen and hat purchases in the summer, while only sunscreen sales rose in the winter. According to the authors, the program impact on children wearing hats was statistically significant during the winter but inconclusive overall.

The program utilized a combination of tip sheets for parents, interactive activities for children, and direct prompts. Additionally, the intervention provided financial discounts on the cost of sunscreen and sun-protective hats to encourage adoption.

The researchers employed a nonequivalent control group design across two distinct zoological sites. One location received the full intervention package, while the second site served as a comparison group that only underwent evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The investigators utilized a nonequivalent control group design to evaluate their program across two distinct zoological locations. Review approach involved conducting the study during both winter and summer months to account for seasonal differences. Researchers collected data on the prevalence of hat usage among children exiting the park facilities. They also monitored the sales figures for sunscreen and protective headwear within the gift shops. The intervention package included educational tip sheets, children's activities, and various prompts. Furthermore, the team offered financial discounts on sun-safe products to encourage consumer participation. The study tracked 8,721 children during the winter phase and 8,524 children during the summer phase. This systematic approach allowed for a robust comparison between the intervention site and the control site.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature reveal that sales of sunscreen and hats increased significantly at the intervention site during the summer. In the winter phase, only sunscreen sales showed a significant relative increase compared to the control group. The researchers observed that children's hat use increased significantly at the intervention site during the winter study. However, the overall impact of the program on children's hat usage remained inconclusive across the entire investigation. The study involved a total of 8,721 children during the winter and 8,524 children during the summer. These figures represent the observational data collected at the exit points of the zoological parks. The intervention successfully promoted the purchase of sun-safe items in both seasonal periods. Nevertheless, the results indicate a discrepancy between purchasing behaviors and the actual adoption of protective habits.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that their multi-faceted program successfully influenced the acquisition of protective gear among zoo patrons. Synthesis and implications indicate that financial incentives and educational prompts serve as viable tools for increasing sales. The researchers propose that the program impact on children wearing hats remains ambiguous based on the collected data. They observe that seasonal variations influence the effectiveness of specific protective measures. The study highlights that while purchasing behavior shifted, actual usage patterns did not consistently improve. The authors note that the intervention design requires further refinement to ensure sustained behavioral changes. They conclude that promoting sun safety in recreational settings demands a combination of strategies to be effective. The findings provide a foundation for future public health initiatives in similar outdoor environments.

The study tracked the prevalence of hat use among 8,721 children in winter and 8,524 children in summer. These observational counts provided the quantitative basis for assessing whether the intervention changed physical protective behaviors.

The researchers measured the success of the intervention by tracking the purchase rates of sunscreen and hats in zoo gift shops. They compared these figures against the observed prevalence of children wearing hats when leaving the park.

The authors propose that while their program effectively promotes the acquisition of sun-safe items, it does not guarantee consistent usage. They suggest that future efforts must bridge the gap between purchasing protective gear and the actual application of sun safety habits.