Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.

A Hahne1

  • 1Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany. hahne@cns.mpg.de

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
|August 29, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discontinuation and non-adherence to endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients: is lack of communication the decisive factor?

Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology·2014
Same author

Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Auditory language comprehension in children with developmental dyslexia: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2006
Same author

The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension.

Neuroreport·2004
Same author

What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory sentence comprehension.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2001
Same author

Brain responses during sentence reading: visual input affects central processes.

Neuroreport·1999

This study compared German sentence comprehension in native (L1) and second language (L2) speakers. L2 learners showed delayed processing for semantic and structural violations, suggesting less automatic language processing.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Neuroscience of Language
  • Second Language Acquisition

Background:

  • Understanding sentence comprehension involves processing semantic and structural information.
  • Differences in processing may arise between native (L1) and second language (L2) speakers due to varying levels of automaticity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate event-related brain potentials (ERPs) associated with semantic and structural violations in German sentences.
  • To compare sentence comprehension processes between native German speakers (L1 group) and Russian speakers learning German as a second language (L2 group).

Main Methods:

  • Auditory presentation of correct, semantically violated, and structurally violated German sentences.
  • Recording electroencephalography (EEG) to measure event-related potentials (ERPs) in L1 and L2 German speakers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of N400 effects for semantic violations and early anterior negativity/late positivity for structural violations.

    • Main Results:

    • Both L1 and L2 groups showed an N400 effect for semantic violations, but with reduced amplitude and delayed latency in the L2 group.
    • Native speakers exhibited an early anterior negativity and late positivity for phrase structure violations.
    • Second language learners lacked the early anterior negativity modulation and showed a delayed late positivity for structural violations.

    Conclusions:

    • Semantic and structural processing in second language comprehension may be less automatic compared to native language processing.
    • ERP patterns suggest distinct neural mechanisms or developmental stages in L2 sentence comprehension.
    • Findings contribute to understanding the neurocognitive basis of second language acquisition and sentence processing.