A randomized comparison of the straight linear approach with electrogram mapping focal approach in selective slow...

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anatomic linear approach in selective AVN slow pathway ablation, in comparison to the widely used electrogram mapping focal approach. It remains undetermined whether or not anatomic linear ablation has a greater potential for eliminating slow pathway conduction than does focal ablation. Fifty consecutive patients (21 men, 29 women, age 56 +/- 14 years) with common type AVNRT were randomly assigned to the linear approach (25 patients) or local electrogram mapping approach (25 patients). A linear lesion was created between the tricuspid annulus, at the midlevel of the coronary sinus (CS) ostium, and the anterior aspect of the CS infundibulum. In 22 (88%) patients in the linear group, the AVNRT was successfully eliminated by 1.5 +/- 0.8 linear RF applications without any complications. All 25 patients in the focal group satisfied the endpoint criteria after 3.8 +/- 2.4 focal RF deliveries. The success rate did not significantly differ between the two groups. Out of the 22 patients with a successful outcome in the linear group, 17 (77%) attained complete abolition of the slow pathway conduction, whereas this was observed in only eight (32%) patients in the focal group (P < 0.005). The session time was significantly shorter in the linear group. Recurrence of the tachycardia was not documented in any patient during a mean follow-up of 18 +/- 8 months except one with residual slow pathway conduction in the focal ablation group. In conclusion, the anatomic linear approach can be performed safely and possesses a greater potential for slow pathway interruption compared to the electrogram mapping focal approach.