Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Responding to uncertainty in nursing practice.

C Thompson1, D Dowding

  • 1Department of Health Studies, Centre for Evidence Based Nursing, Genesis 6, University of York, York, YO10 5DQ, UK.

International Journal of Nursing Studies
|August 29, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The doctor in this new day.

Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia·2010
Same author

A phase I study of lenalidomide in combination with fludarabine and rituximab in previously untreated CLL/SLL.

Leukemia·2010
Same author

The novel protein BboRhop68 is expressed by intraerythrocytic stages of Babesia bovis.

Parasitology international·2010
Same author

A systematic review on animal models of maternal high fat feeding and offspring glycaemic control.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2010
Same author

Multisensory determinants of orientation perception: task-specific sex differences.

The European journal of neuroscience·2010
Same author

Changing concepts of homosexuality in psychoanalysis.

Psychiatry·2010
Same journal

Effect of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for children with acute appendicitis: A randomized controlled trial.

International journal of nursing studies·2026
Same journal

Cognitive impairment, no dementia and hospitalizations - the role of formal and informal care: A population-based cohort study.

International journal of nursing studies·2026
Same journal

Rethinking occupational health and safety for healthcare workers treating Ebola.

International journal of nursing studies·2026
Same journal

Integrating fundamentals of care - moving from strategic intent to clinical practice: An organizational case study.

International journal of nursing studies·2026
Same journal

Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: An updated integrative review.

International journal of nursing studies·2026
Same journal

Comparative effectiveness of individual-level psychosocial interventions for nurse burnout and its core dimensions: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

International journal of nursing studies·2026
See all related articles

Clinical uncertainty is unavoidable. This paper reviews approaches to managing uncertainty, advocating for nursing research and development (R&D) to prioritize studies comparing intuitive versus rational decision-making in clinical practice.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical decision-making
  • Healthcare management
  • Nursing research

Background:

  • Practicing clinicians face unavoidable uncertainty in daily practice.
  • Existing models of uncertainty require examination of strategic approaches.
  • The paper reviews rationality, bounded rationality, and intuition as strategies for managing uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline Katz's model of uncertainty.
  • To examine the power of rationality, bounded rationality, and intuition in managing clinical uncertainty.
  • To propose future directions for nursing research and development (R&D).

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of uncertainty models.
  • Analysis of theoretical and strategic approaches to uncertainty.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conceptual examination of rationality, bounded rationality, and intuition.
  • Main Results:

    • Uncertainty is an inherent aspect of clinical practice.
    • Rationality, bounded rationality, and intuition offer different frameworks for addressing uncertainty.
    • Current nursing R&D may not adequately address clinical uncertainty.

    Conclusions:

    • Nursing R&D must integrate uncertainty more comprehensively into its agenda.
    • Future R&D should feature high-quality studies comparing intuitive and rational-analytical approaches.
    • Evidence-based evaluation of decision-making strategies is crucial for clinical practice.