Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Screening of Axonal Degeneration in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Ultrasonography and Nerve Conduction Studies
Published on: January 11, 2019
Endoscopic versus open surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome
T E Trumble1, M Gilbert, W V McCallister
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle 98195, USA. trumble@u.washington.edu
Abstract:
The impact of CTS is significant as evidenced by the fact that only back injuries result in greater rates of employee absenteeism in the workplace. CTR is now the most commonly performed surgical procedure in the United States. Earlier efforts using open surgical techniques were associated with significant morbidity, which some would argue is greater than that associated with the disease itself. The addition of endoscopy to surgeon's armamentarium offers the promise of decreased morbidity associated with the surgical treatment of CTS. Evidence indicates that when compared with open CTR, endoscopic CTR results in earlier achievement of patient satisfaction and functional outcomes. As a result, it is becoming clear that endoscopic surgery is a safe and effective method of treating CTS.

