Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Proposal for a "European Scoring System for Laparoscopic Operations in Urology".

B Guillonneau1, C C Abbou, J D Doublet

  • 1European Society of Uro-Technology, European Union. bertrand.guillonneau@imm.fr

European Urology
|August 31, 2001
PubMed
Summary

A new scoring system evaluates laparoscopic urology procedures based on technical difficulty, operative risk, and attention required. This system provides a framework for learning and discussing urological laparoscopy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does site of specimen extraction affect incisional hernia rate after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2017
Same author

[PET/CT and biochemical recurrence of prostate adenocarcinoma: Added value of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 when <sup>18</sup>F-fluorocholine is non-contributive].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2017
Same author

Thulium laser enucleation (ThuLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate in saline (TURis): A randomized prospective trial to compare intra and early postoperative outcomes.

Actas urologicas espanolas·2017
Same author

28-Year Survival following Several Metastasectomies, Going through 8th Line Systemic Therapy in a Case of mRCC.

Case reports in urology·2015
Same author

Laparoscopic adenomectomy versus Eraser laser enucleation of the prostate.

World journal of urology·2015
Same author

Tissue effects resulting from eraser laser enucleation of the prostate: in vivo investigation.

Urologia internationalis·2013

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Education

Background:

  • Laparoscopic procedures are increasingly common in urology.
  • Standardized methods for assessing surgical difficulty are lacking.
  • Objective evaluation is crucial for training and patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel scoring system for assessing the difficulty of current laparoscopic urological procedures.
  • To establish a quantifiable scale for classifying surgical complexity.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of laparoscopic urological procedures based on technical difficulty, operative risk, and attention required.
  • A 1-7 scoring scale for each criterion, with a total score determining global difficulty.
  • Classification into six levels: Easy (E), Slightly Difficult (SD), Fairly Difficult (FD), Difficult (D), Very Difficult (VD), and Extremely Difficult (ED).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A comprehensive scoring system was proposed for common laparoscopic urology procedures.
  • The system categorizes procedures into distinct difficulty levels.
  • Expert validation through retrospective review and literature synthesis.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed scoring scale serves as a foundation for discussion, teaching, and learning in urological laparoscopy.
  • The scale is dynamic and intended for regular revision and updates.
  • Aims to enhance surgical training and standardize complexity assessment.