Related Experiment Videos
A new determination of G using two methods.
T J Quinn1, C C Speake, S J Richman
1Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, Pavillon de Breteuil, F-92312 Sèvres Cedex, France. tquinn@bipm.org
Physical Review Letters
|September 5, 2001
Summary
This study precisely measured the gravitational constant (G) using a torsion-strip balance in two independent methods. The experiment yielded a new value for G, consistent with previous findings but slightly higher than a recent measurement.
Area of Science:
- Physics
- Metrology
- Gravitation
Background:
- Accurate measurement of the gravitational constant (G) is crucial for fundamental physics and geophysics.
- Previous measurements of G have exhibited significant discrepancies, highlighting the need for independent verification.
- Torsion balance experiments are a primary method for determining G due to their sensitivity to weak forces.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a new, precise measurement of the gravitational constant (G).
- To validate the measurement using two substantially independent experimental configurations of a torsion-strip balance.
- To compare the obtained value of G with recent experimental results.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a torsion-strip balance for measuring the gravitational force between masses.
- Employed two distinct and independent experimental setups with the torsion-strip balance.
- Analyzed data to determine the value of G and its associated uncertainty.
Main Results:
- The gravitational constant G was measured as 6.675 59(27)x10^-11 m^3 kg^-1 s^-2.
- The result has a standard uncertainty of 4.1 parts in 10^5.
- The two independent methods yielded consistent results, with a correlation coefficient of -0.18.
- The measured G is approximately 2 parts in 10^4 higher than a recent result by Gundlach and Merkowitz.
Conclusions:
- The study provides a new, high-precision value for the gravitational constant G.
- The consistency between the two independent methods strengthens the reliability of the result.
- The slight deviation from a recent measurement warrants further investigation into potential systematic effects in G determinations.