Related Experiment Videos
Restraint practices in Australasian emergency departments
M E Cannon1, P Sprivulis, J McCarthy
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Fremantle Hospital, Western Australia, Australia. mariannecannon@hotmail.com
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
|September 5, 2001
Summary
Patient restraint is common in Australasian emergency departments, with limited formal training, policies, or audits. This highlights a need for improved practices in managing restraint procedures.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Clinical Practice
- Healthcare Policy
Background:
- Patient restraint is a frequently utilized intervention in emergency departments globally.
- Understanding the nuances of restraint techniques, policies, and training is crucial for patient safety and quality of care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the utilization rates of various patient restraint techniques.
- To evaluate the existing restraint policies and training programs within Australasian emergency departments.
Main Methods:
- A survey was administered to 116 emergency departments across Australasia.
- Data collected included types of restraint, indications, contraindications, training, policies, documentation, and audit requirements.
Main Results:
- The estimated rate of patient restraint is 3.3 episodes per 1000 presentations, with common indications including violence, psychosis, and acute brain syndrome.
- Chemical restraint is universally used, often with haloperidol, midazolam, or diazepam. Manual restraint precedes chemical or mechanical restraint in many cases.
- Formal training for restraint is infrequent (33% for chemical restraint), and less than half of departments have written policies, with only 11% auditing practices.
Conclusions:
- Patient restraint is a prevalent practice in Australasian emergency departments.
- There is a significant deficit in formal training, documentation, and auditing of restraint practices.
- Addressing these gaps is essential due to the clinical, occupational health, and medico-legal implications of restraint use.