Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Assessment of Pulmonary Capillary Blood Volume, Membrane Diffusing Capacity, and Intrapulmonary Arteriovenous Anastomoses During Exercise
Published on: February 20, 2017
The reliability and validity of the Astrand nomogram and linear extrapolation for deriving VO2max from submaximal
1Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Radiography, Division of Physiotherapy, Glasgow Caledonian University, Faculty of Health, City Campus, Glasgow, UK. amacsween@qmuc.ac.uk
Measuring aerobic power using submaximal exercise tests is feasible. Linear extrapolation of heart rate and oxygen uptake data provides a reliable alternative to VO2max testing, especially for clinical and research applications.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Cardiorespiratory Fitness Assessment
Background:
- VO2max testing is the gold standard for aerobic power but is highly demanding and poses practical/ethical challenges for non-athletic and patient populations.
- Existing alternative methods like the Astrand-Ryhming nomogram and linear extrapolation have limitations in equipment and sample size.
- A need exists for a reliable and accessible method to measure aerobic power in diverse populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of linear extrapolation of submaximal heart rate/oxygen uptake data compared to VO2max.
- To assess the Astrand-Ryhming nomogram as a predictive tool for aerobic power.
- To determine a practical alternative for aerobic power assessment in non-athletic and clinical settings.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-five healthy subjects completed 52 trials using the Bruce treadmill protocol under stringent VO2max criteria.
- Respiratory gases were measured using a portable gas analyzer with a five-second sample period.
- Data analysis focused on comparing the reliability and validity of linear extrapolations (to three heart rate maximum estimates) against the Astrand nomogram prediction.
Main Results:
- Linear extrapolation demonstrated high reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.9433, comparable to observed VO2max (0.9443).
- The extrapolation method showed a minimal bias of -1.1 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1), indicating a 2.19% underestimate of aerobic power.
- Extrapolation proved preferable to the Astrand-Ryhming nomogram in this study.
Conclusions:
- Submaximal data extrapolation is a reliable method for aerobic power assessment, suitable for clinical monitoring and research.
- The use of portable equipment and submaximal testing expands research possibilities in various populations and non-laboratory settings.
- This study provides empirical support for using linear extrapolation as a valid alternative to VO2max testing.
More Related Videos
07:26Conducting Maximal and Submaximal Endurance Exercise Testing to Measure Physiological and Biological Responses to Acute Exercise in Humans
Published on: October 17, 2018
09:24A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers
Published on: January 28, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations