Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Modeling dynamic skinfold compression.

R. Ward1, R. Rempel, G.S. Anderson

  • 1Department of Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

American Journal of Human Biology : the Official Journal of the Human Biology Council
|September 5, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Enantiospecific Synthesis of an Isoxazoline. A RGD Mimic Platelet GPIIb/IIIa Antagonist.

The Journal of organic chemistryยท1997
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Skinfold compression dynamics were modeled using a two-component mechanical system. This model revealed significant differences in elasticity and viscosity between sexes and measurement sites.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human Physiology
  • Anthropometry

Background:

  • Understanding skinfold compressibility is crucial for accurate body composition analysis.
  • Previous models of skinfold compression have not fully captured the dynamic mechanical properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To measure real-time skinfold compression.
  • To develop and validate a mechanical model for skinfold compression.
  • To investigate sex and site-specific differences in skinfold mechanical properties.

Main Methods:

  • Real-time skinfold compression measured at triceps, abdominal, and medial calf sites using an adapted skinfold caliper.
  • Data from eight males and eight females (18-40 years) were used to model compression curves.
  • A two-component (parallel spring-viscous elements in series) mechanical model was developed and compared to one- and three-component models.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The two-component model provided the best fit for skinfold compression data.
  • Model coefficients (elasticity and viscosity) differed significantly between sexes and measurement sites.
  • Females exhibited greater elasticity and lower viscosity than males; the triceps site showed less elasticity and viscosity.

Conclusions:

  • A two-component mechanical model accurately describes real-time skinfold compression.
  • Sex and anatomical site are important determinants of skinfold mechanical properties.
  • These findings have implications for improving anthropometric measurement techniques and body composition assessments.