Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A more complete task-set reconfiguration in random than in predictable task switch.

F J Tornay1, E G Milán

  • 1Departamento de Psicología Experimental y Fisiología del Comportamiento, Facultad de Psicología, University of Granada, Spain. ftornay@goliat.ugr.es

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|September 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Switching tasks randomly incurs less time cost than predictable task switching when sufficient preparation time is provided. This suggests distinct task-set preparation mechanisms are involved in random versus predictable task alternation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Auras in mysticism and synaesthesia: a comparison.

Consciousness and cognition·2011
Same author

Spotlight failure effect in exogenous orienting.

Acta psychologica·2001
Same author

Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Perception & psychophysics·1997
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Task switching incurs a cognitive cost, impacting performance.
  • Understanding task-set preparation is crucial for optimizing task-switching paradigms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the time cost of task switching under predictable and random sequences.
  • To investigate the role of preparation time on switch costs in different conditions.
  • To differentiate between endogenous and exogenous components of switch cost.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted comparing task switching costs.
  • Conditions included predictable task sequences and random task alternation.
  • Preparation time was systematically varied.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Random task switching showed a smaller time cost with adequate preparation time.
  • Random-switch cost decreased with preparation time, unlike predictable-switch cost which reached an asymptote.
  • Only predictable switching exhibited an exogenous component of cost.

Conclusions:

  • Task-set preparation differs between random and predictable task switching.
  • The findings challenge existing models by suggesting unique preparation mechanisms for random task alternation.