[Cost effectiveness of clopidogrel in secondary cardiovascular prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on the...

As a result of medical progress each year numerous new therapies are introduced to the medical community, and each of them must prove its usefulness in two arenas. Firstly, does the new therapy improve outcomes relative to conventional therapy? If this test is passed, the second question is: are the improved outcomes worth the extra costs? Controlled clinical trials answer the first question and economic analysis, the second. The CARPIE-Study has proven, that Clopidogrel, a new antiplatelet drug, was superior in secondary prevention of cardiovascular events to aspirin. On the basis of this study we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Swiss third party payers. The following costs were included in the analysis: treatment costs of aspirin and clopidogrel, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke and primary non-fatal intracranial haemorrhage. For the calculation of the years of life gained the DEALE-method was applied. The net costs of treating 1000 patients, i.e. incremental drug costs less savings of treatment costs, are Fr. 1.5 Mio. The intervention with Clopidogrel lead to an additional gain of 63 life years in compared to aspirin. At additional yearly cost of Fr. 722.--per patient the analysis yield a cost-effectiveness of CHF 24,164 (nominal) Fr. 22,837 (discounted) per additional year of live saved. The results suggest that the cost-effectiveness of Clopidogrel in secondary prevention lie well within the range of other preventive cardiovascular interventions. Therefore, from an economic perspective the use of Clopidogrel in secondary prevention of major cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease is justifiable.