Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2026

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Fairness or stereotypes? Young children's priorities when evaluating group exclusion and inclusion
M Killen1, K Pisacane, J Lee-Kim
1Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, College Park 20742-1131, USA. mk141@umail.umd.edu
Abstract:
Seventy-two children (35 4 1/2-year-olds and 37 5 1/2-year-olds), nearly evenly divided by gender, from European American (71%), Asian American (17%), and African American (12%) middle-class backgrounds, were individually interviewed about straightforward exclusion and inclusion for two gender-stereotypic peer-group contexts: activities (doll and truck play) and role-play (teacher and firefighter). All children evaluated straightforward exclusion based on gender (e.g., girls excluding a boy from doll play) as wrong and used moral reasons. Preliminary inclusion decisions in the activity contexts (choosing a boy or a girl to join the group) were based on stereotypic expectations, particularly for younger children. Given the opportunity to weigh alternative considerations, however, all children gave priority to fairness over stereotypic expectations in both multifaceted inclusion peer-group contexts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
In- and Out-Groups
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Stereotype Content Model
Groupthink
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

