Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sampling genotypes in large pedigrees with loops.

S A Fernández1, R L Fernando, B Guldbrandtsen

  • 1Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 225 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA 50011, USA.

Genetics, Selection, Evolution : GSE
|September 18, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genomic inbreeding and selection signatures in the local dairy breed Icelandic Cattle.

Animal genetics·2021
Same author

Accuracy of genomic prediction of shell quality in a White Leghorn line.

Poultry science·2020
Same author

Impact of Management Practices on Prevalence of Soybean Sclerotinia Stem Rot in the North-Central United States and on Farmers' Decisions Under Uncertainty.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Stromal PTEN inhibits the expansion of mammary epithelial stem cells through Jagged-1.

Oncogene·2017
Same author

Oncologic doses of zoledronic acid induce site specific suppression of bone modelling in rice rats.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2017
Same author

A comparison of identity-by-descent and identity-by-state matrices that are used for genetic evaluation and estimation of variance components.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie·2017
Same journal

The mitogenome diversity of Alpine Rendena cattle: new clues on its maternal origin and the complex substructure of haplogroup T3.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026
Same journal

Genomic partitioning and functional dissection of inbreeding depression for stature in Brown Swiss cattle.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026
Same journal

Modest contribution of metabolomic data to genomic prediction of breeding values for feed conversion ratio in pigs.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026
Same journal

Determining crossover count and position in two pig lines with different selection histories.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026
Same journal

Effect of methylation on genome mutability in cattle.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026
Same journal

Genomic selection strategies and their potential to maintain rare alleles and de-novo mutations: a long-term assessment.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026
See all related articles

The new ESIP sampler improves genotype probability estimation in genetic analyses by jointly sampling genotypes across pedigrees, outperforming the traditional scalar-Gibbs method in accuracy and efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Computational Biology
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are used for linkage and segregation analyses but face computational challenges.
  • Scalar-Gibbs sampling, a common MCMC method, can suffer from slow mixing and irreducibility issues with multi-allele markers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel genotype sampling method, the ESIP sampler, that overcomes limitations of existing MCMC approaches.
  • To evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of the ESIP sampler compared to scalar-Gibbs and iterative peeling.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the ESIP (Elston-Stewart algorithm and iterative peeling) sampler for joint genotype sampling across pedigrees.
  • Compared genotype probability estimates from ESIP, scalar-Gibbs, and iterative peeling against exact probabilities from the Elston-Stewart algorithm.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed effective chain size (ECS) for both ESIP and scalar-Gibbs samplers.

    • Main Results:

    • ESIP and iterative peeling produced genotype probabilities very close to exact values.
    • ESIP required significantly shorter chains and burn-in periods than scalar-Gibbs for comparable or superior accuracy.
    • Scalar-Gibbs showed substantially lower effective chain sizes and less accurate results, especially in large pedigrees.

    Conclusions:

    • The ESIP sampler offers a more accurate and computationally efficient alternative to scalar-Gibbs for genotype probability estimation in genetic analyses.
    • ESIP is particularly advantageous for large pedigrees where exact computation is infeasible.