Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2026

Electrophysiological Methods to Assess Peripheral Pain Block in an Anesthetized Rat
Published on: November 21, 2025
Effect of impulse duration on patients' perception of electrical stimulation and block effectiveness during axillary
Z J Koscielniak-Nielsen1, H Rassmussen, K Jepsen
1Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. zjkn@rh.dk
Background And Objectives:
Chronaxie of the motor-neurons (A-alpha) is shorter than that of the sensory A-delta and C neurons. Therefore, a short current impulse should elicit a painless muscle twitch. This randomized, double-blind study of patients having ambulatory axillary block by multiple neurostimulations compared patients' perception of electrical stimulation, latency, and quality of analgesia and the incidence of adverse effects.
Methods:
In group S (short impulse, n = 44) 0.1-ms-current impulses were used and in group L (long impulse, n = 43) 0.3-ms impulses were used. Initial amplitude was 2 mA. Local anesthetic was injected near the 4 terminal nerves (musculocutaneous, median, ulnar, radial) after reaching a target amplitude between 0.1 and 0.5 mA. Patients were specifically requested to categorize sensation of electrical stimulation "electric shocks" as follows: no discomfort, discomfort, pain. Pain was then quantified on a visual analog scale (VAS). Surgically ineffective blocks were supplemented after 30 minutes. A patient was defined as ready for surgery (complete block) when analgesia was present in all areas distal to the elbow.
Results:
There were no significant differences between groups in quali- and quantitative assessments of electrical stimulation. Eight patients (18%) in either group described the sensation as "strange or funny." Eight patients in group S and 13 (30%) in group L reported discomfort during stimulation. Twenty-eight patients (64%) in S group and 22 (52%) in L group experienced pain. Median VAS (0 to 100) of this pain was 21 and 24, respectively. Block performance time was 9 minutes in L group and 11 minutes in S group (P < .001), but the latency of analgesia was 23 minutes for both groups and the times to achieve complete block were, therefore, similar: 32 minutes in L group and 34 minutes in S group (not significant [NS]). Nine group S and 8 group L patients required supplementary blocks (NS). The incidence of vessel punctures and accidental intravascular injections were also similar in both groups.
Conclusions:
This study did not confirm our hypothesis that short-current impulses (0.1 ms) make neurostimulation of peripheral nerves painless, by selectively depolarizing motor-neurons. Longer impulses (0.3 ms) shorten block performance time, probably by easier location of the nerves, but the clinical relevance of this finding is doubtful.
Related Concept Videos
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because succinylcholine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics
Instead, they are transported by the blood to different tissues. Muscles with a greater blood supply (arteries) and blood flow receive more...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
