Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Considerations in collecting Rorschach reference data.

I B Weiner1

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa 33613, USA.

Journal of Personality Assessment
|September 20, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The handbook of humanistic psychology: leading edges in theory, research, and practice.

Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research·2012
Same author

Advancing the science of psychological assessment: the Rorschach Inkblot Method as exemplar.

Psychological assessment·2002
Same author

The Rorschach Inblot Test: a debate. The value of Rorschach assessment.

The Harvard mental health letter·2002
Same author

Early identification of schizophrenia.

Adolescent medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2000
Same author

Making Rorschach interpretation as good as it can be.

Journal of personality assessment·2000
Same author

Using the Rorschach properly in practice and research.

Journal of clinical psychology·2000
Same journal

Comparing the Psychometric Characteristics of Two 32-Item Versions of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: An Extended Replication Study in English and Dutch.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Psychometric Evaluation of a Contextualized Version of the German BFI-2 for the Digital World Across Self- and Other-Ratings.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Case Studies with the Rorschach Test: A Systematic Literature Review.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

A Stratified Analysis of Body Perception, Interoception and Somatosensory Brain Processing in Healthy Adults.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Predicting the Level of Suicide Risk with the MMPI-3.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and Strengths Use Scale (SUS): Revisiting Psychometric Properties and Gender Invariance in the General Spanish Population.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
See all related articles

New Rorschach research data from nonpatients differs from established norms. Further research requires updated guidelines for collecting reference data to ensure accurate psychological disturbance identification.

Area of Science:

  • Psychological assessment
  • Clinical psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Recent Rorschach research presents nonpatient reference data diverging from the established Comprehensive System norms (Exner, 1995).
  • Existing normative data may require re-evaluation due to these discrepancies.
  • The unstructured nature of the Rorschach test poses challenges for data collection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose guidelines for collecting Rorschach reference data in future research.
  • To address discrepancies between new and existing nonpatient normative data.
  • To improve the accuracy of psychological disturbance identification using Rorschach protocols.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent Rorschach research findings with nonpatient samples.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of discrepancies with established Comprehensive System normative data.
  • Development of proposed guidelines for future Rorschach normative studies.

    • Main Results:

    • New nonpatient Rorschach data show significant differences from existing norms.
    • The unstructured Rorschach assessment can complicate data collection from volunteers.
    • Current methods for identifying psychological disturbance may be less accurate than comparative approaches.

    Conclusions:

    • Conclusions from new Rorschach data are premature without revised data collection guidelines.
    • Future normative studies should incorporate diverse patient and nonpatient samples.
    • Identifying psychological disturbance may be more accurate by comparing Rorschach records to patient exemplars rather than nonpatient norms.