Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variation in motor threshold with frequency using kHz frequency alternating current.

A R Ward1, V J Robertson

  • 1Department of Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Victoria, 3086, Australia. a.ward@latrobe.edu.au

Muscle & Nerve
|September 20, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cryptococcus gattii: A dilemma in diagnosis and treatment in sub-Saharan Africa an area with high HIV prevalence.

The Central African journal of medicine·2017
Same author

Electrode coupling media for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

The Australian journal of physiotherapy·2014
Same author

CONCERNING THE PRESENCE OF STREPTOCOCCI IN THE HEALTHY UDDER OF A COW.

Journal. Boston Society of Medical Sciences·2009
Same author

A national study of the availability and use of electrophysical agents by Australian physiotherapists.

Physiotherapy theory and practice·2009
Same author

Hospital stay and discharge outcomes after knee arthroplasty.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same author

Occupational health and safety in physiotherapy: guidelines for practice.

The Australian journal of physiotherapy·2001

This study shows that high-frequency alternating current (AC) stimulation above 10 kHz may not be clinically useful for nerve rehabilitation due to nerve fiber firing rate changes and fiber dropout. Results indicate reduced effectiveness at higher frequencies.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation Technology

Background:

  • Understanding the effects of alternating current (AC) stimulation on nerve excitability is crucial for developing effective therapeutic interventions.
  • Previous research has explored AC stimulation, but a comprehensive analysis of its frequency dependence on motor thresholds, particularly at higher frequencies (kHz range), is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the frequency dependence of motor thresholds for alternating current (AC) stimulation from 1 kHz to 25 kHz.
  • To compare the effects of different AC waveforms (continuous, burst, single-cycle) on nerve activation and summation.
  • To evaluate the clinical utility of high-frequency AC stimulation in rehabilitation.

Main Methods:

  • Transcutaneous application of sinusoidal AC stimuli with ramped intensity to measure induced wrist extensor torque.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing log torque versus stimulus voltage plots to precisely determine motor thresholds.
  • Comparing three AC stimulus types: continuous, 10 ms bursts at 50 Hz, and 50-Hz single-cycle.

    • Main Results:

    • Motor thresholds varied significantly with stimulus frequency and waveform, indicating frequency-dependent summation of subthreshold depolarizations.
    • Summation efficiency increased at higher kHz frequencies for continuous and burst AC compared to single-cycle stimuli.
    • Evidence of high-frequency nerve fiber firing rate changes and fiber dropout was observed, escalating with AC frequency.

    Conclusions:

    • The frequency and waveform dependence of motor responses suggest limitations for high-frequency AC stimulation.
    • Nerve fiber firing rate modulation and potential fiber dropout at frequencies above 10 kHz reduce the efficacy of continuous or modulated AC.
    • Frequencies exceeding 10 kHz appear to have minimal to no practical clinical value in physical rehabilitation procedures.