Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Autoaugmentation peritoneocystoplasty in a sheep model.

C E Close1, P A Dewan, P J Ashwood

  • 1Departments of Surgery, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.

BJU International
|September 21, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Autoaugmentation peritoneocystoplasty (AAPC) in sheep did not reliably increase bladder volume or compliance. Results were inferior to autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty (AAGC).

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Summertime methane and carbon dioxide emission rates and associated variables from a national-scale survey of 146 reservoirs in the United States.

Limnology and oceanography letters·2026
Same author

Ecosystem services in Iowa agricultural catchments: Hypotheses for scenarios with water quality wetlands and improved tile drainage.

Journal of soil and water conservation·2025
Same author

Early urodynamic findings after complete primary repair of exstrophy.

Journal of pediatric urology·2023
Same author

Road to pediatric urology subcertification: a 25-year journey.

Journal of pediatric urology·2019
Same author

Short-term outcomes of the multi-institutional bladder exstrophy consortium: Successes and complications in the first two years of collaboration.

Journal of pediatric urology·2017
Same author

Maternal adverse effects with different loading infusion rates of antenatal magnesium sulphate for preterm fetal neuroprotection: the IRIS randomised trial.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2014
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Pediatric Surgery

Background:

  • Bladder augmentation is crucial for managing conditions causing bladder dysfunction.
  • Autoaugmentation techniques aim to increase bladder capacity and compliance.
  • Comparing different autoaugmentation methods is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate autoaugmentation peritoneocystoplasty (AAPC) in a sheep model.
  • To compare AAPC outcomes with autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty (AAGC) in sheep and pediatric patients.

Main Methods:

  • Ten 6-month-old male lambs underwent bladder augmentation using parietal peritoneum (AAPC).
  • Urodynamic evaluation was performed 6 months post-surgery.
  • Results were compared to control sheep and AAGC group using Mann-Whitney U-test.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • AAPC did not significantly increase mean bladder volume compared to pre-surgery or controls.
  • Bladder volumes in the AAPC group were significantly lower than in the AAGC group.
  • Bladder compliance in the AAPC group was not significantly different from controls but lower than AAGC.

Conclusions:

  • Autoaugmentation peritoneocystoplasty (AAPC) in a sheep model does not reliably enhance bladder volume or compliance.
  • AAPC demonstrates inferior results in volume and compliance compared to autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty (AAGC).