Related Experiment Videos
Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty.
A L Whaley1, D J Berry, W S Harmsen
1Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume
|September 25, 2001
Summary
Extra-large uncemented acetabular components show excellent outcomes for hip revision surgery with bone loss. These implants demonstrate a low rate of aseptic loosening and good functional improvement at intermediate-term follow-up.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Reconstructive Surgery
Background:
- Acetabular revision surgery addresses aseptic failure of total hip arthroplasty.
- Extra-large uncemented components offer potential benefits in acetabular revision, particularly with bone loss.
- Limited data exists on the long-term efficacy of these larger implants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of extra-large uncemented porous-coated acetabular components used for revision surgery.
- To assess component survival and functional results in patients with acetabular bone loss.
- To determine the rate of aseptic loosening and other complications at a minimum five-year follow-up.
Main Methods:
- Eighty-nine extra-large uncemented acetabular components (Harris-Galante-I or II cups) were implanted in 89 patients (46 men, 43 women) undergoing revision for aseptic failure.
- Patients had a mean age of 59 years and significant acetabular bone deficiency (segmental or combined).
- Bone grafting (particulate or bulk) was utilized in a majority of cases; follow-up was at least five years.
Main Results:
- At a mean follow-up of 7.2 years, four components required re-revision or removal (two for aseptic loosening).
- The eight-year survival probability of the acetabular component was 93% (any reason for removal) and 98% (aseptic loosening).
- The mean modified Harris hip score improved significantly from 56 to 83 points; dislocation was the most frequent complication (11 patients).
Conclusions:
- Extra-large uncemented acetabular components are effective for revision surgery in the setting of bone loss.
- These implants demonstrate favorable intermediate-term results with a low incidence of aseptic loosening.
- The use of these components can lead to significant functional improvement in patients undergoing acetabular revision.