Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Correlation coefficient estimation involving a left censored laboratory assay variable.

R H Lyles1, D Fan, R Chuachoowong

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, The Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd. N.E., Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. rlyles@sph.emory.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|September 25, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Short-term outcomes of endoscopic intermuscular dissection for early rectal cancer with deep submucosal infiltration: a single-center experience from China.

Techniques in coloproctology·2025
Same author

More shade or sun? How fluctuating light affects photosynthesis in cotton.

Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)·2025
Same author

Isoniazid-resistant TB and associated factors in Ethiopia.

Public health action·2025
Same author

Modelling enzyme inhibition toxicity of ionic liquid from molecular structure via convolutional neural network model.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2023
Same author

IS IT MEANINGFUL FOR SERUM MYOGLOBIN IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19 DECREASED?

Georgian medical news·2023
Same author

Gastrointestinal: A case of splenic sarcoidosis characterized by weight loss.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology·2023
Same journal

Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Treatment Decision Estimation for Right-Censored Survival Data Through Parameter Transfer Learning.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces two statistical methods to accurately estimate correlations when data has assay detection limits. These methods avoid bias from common but flawed approaches, improving reliability for biological marker analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Infectious Disease Research

Background:

  • Assay detection limits create indeterminate values, complicating correlation analysis.
  • Common methods like data deletion or substitution introduce bias in correlation estimates.
  • Accurate correlation is crucial for understanding relationships between biological markers, such as HIV viral load and CD4 counts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and evaluate two parametric statistical methods for estimating correlation with left-censored data.
  • To compare the performance of these novel methods against traditional ad hoc approaches.
  • To address bias in correlation and confidence interval estimation caused by assay detection limits.

Main Methods:

  • Maximum likelihood estimation for correlation with left-censored data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Multiple imputation adaptation for robust correlation estimation and confidence interval coverage.
  • Empirical assessment using simulated data and a real-world clinical trial dataset.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed maximum likelihood and multiple imputation methods provide less biased correlation estimates compared to ad hoc methods.
    • These parametric techniques maintain better confidence interval coverage, especially under censoring.
    • The methods reduce to the standard Pearson's correlation coefficient when no censoring is present.

    Conclusions:

    • Parametric methods, specifically maximum likelihood and multiple imputation, are superior for estimating correlations with left-censored biological data.
    • Ad hoc methods for handling assay detection limits can significantly bias correlation results.
    • Accurate correlation estimation is vital for reliable interpretation of biological marker relationships in clinical research.