Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Patient satisfaction after MRCP and ERCP.

K Menon1, A N Barkun, J Romagnuolo

  • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University and the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
|September 25, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-World Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Delayed surgery during the Covid-19 pandemic did not affect long-term outcomes of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Surgical oncology·2024
Same author

Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic minor hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the UK.

Surgical oncology·2023
Same author

Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and interleukin-6 for postoperative infection in major gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2022
Same author

Dragon 1 Protocol Manuscript: Training, Accreditation, Implementation and Safety Evaluation of Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization (PVE/HVE) to Accelerate Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Hypertrophy.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2022
Same author

Evaluation of treatment delays in hepatopancreatico-biliary surgery during the first COVID-19 wave.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2022
Same journal

Calendar of Courses, Symposiums and Conferences.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Molecular Nonendoscopic Tests for the Early Detection of Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma and High-Grade Dysplasia: Promising Progress.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

ACG Clinical Guideline: Colonic Diverticulitis.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Continuing Medical Education Questions: July 2026.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Continuing Medical Education Questions: July 2026.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

2026 CME Information.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
See all related articles

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) offers improved patient satisfaction over endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) regarding anxiety and pain. However, patients found MRCP more difficult than expected, with claustrophobia being a common issue.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a noninvasive diagnostic tool for pancreaticobiliary abnormalities.
  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive procedure often used for similar conditions.
  • Patient tolerance and satisfaction differences between MRCP and ERCP have not been extensively studied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare patient satisfaction following MRCP and ERCP when performed sequentially.
  • To evaluate patient perceptions of anxiety, pain, discomfort, and tolerability for both procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective recruitment of 34 patients undergoing ERCP, with MRCP performed beforehand.
  • Validated questionnaires with Likert scales assessed patient satisfaction dimensions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis included Chi-squared and Student's t-tests with 95% confidence intervals.

    • Main Results:

    • MRCP was associated with significantly lower reported pain (p < 0.001) and discomfort (p = 0.047) compared to ERCP.
    • Patients found MRCP more difficult than anticipated (p = 0.012), with claustrophobia or noise being the primary concern for 15 patients.
    • Overall preference favored MRCP (p = 0.01), particularly in patients undergoing purely diagnostic ERCPs, though 41% did not clearly prefer MRCP.

    Conclusions:

    • MRCP is generally well-tolerated and preferred by specific patient subgroups, especially for diagnostic purposes.
    • Limitations such as perceived difficulty and claustrophobia in MRCP should be communicated to patients.
    • Improving patient satisfaction with MRCP may involve strategies to mitigate noise and claustrophobia, such as premedication or newer scanner technology.