Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Post-thoracotomy analgesia.

I D Conacher1

  • 1Department of Thoracic Anaesthesia, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

Anesthesiology Clinics of North America
|September 27, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Modernizing thoracic surgery pain relief requires addressing safety, quality, and cost-effectiveness. Standardized outcome measures and new drug evaluations are crucial for optimizing patient care.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Last resting places of the Zambezi Expedition (1858-1864) doctors.

Journal of medical biography·2018
Same author

Dr John Dickinson (1832-1863): The man behind the bird.

Journal of medical biography·2014
Same author

The King's anaesthetic.

Journal of medical biography·2014
Same author

The big ideas of Edgar Alexander Pask (1912-66).

Journal of medical biography·2010
Same author

Anesthesia for thoracoscopic surgery.

Journal of minimal access surgery·2009
Same author

Significance of tricuspid valve dysfunction as a consequence of one-lung ventilation.

British journal of anaesthesia·2008

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Pain Management

Background:

  • Pain relief strategies for thoracic surgery require modernization to meet evolving demands.
  • Current practices must be rationalized, focusing on safety, quality measurement, and cost-effectiveness.
  • Rationing necessitates recognizing that all patients deserve high-quality pain relief, not necessarily five-star services.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To contextualize current thoracic pain relief practices within anticipated service demands.
  • To identify key issues for improving pain relief services: safety, quality definition/measurement, and value for money.
  • To propose methods for standardizing outcome measures and evaluating new/revisited pharmacologic agents.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current practices and emerging trends in thoracic pain management.
  • Discussion of essential elements for service improvement: safety, quality, and cost-effectiveness.
  • Proposal of analytical approaches: disaggregation analysis, pain profiling, respiratory restoration factor revision, and optimization modeling.

Main Results:

  • Newer drugs (clonidine, ropivacaine, modified local anesthetics) and revisited agents (ketamine) show promise but require standardized outcome evaluation.
  • Uniformity in presenting outcome measures is essential for determining the place of these agents.
  • Suggested analytical methods aim to address clinical and organizational demands for holistic patient care.

Conclusions:

  • Effective, safe, and affordable pain relief in thoracic surgery necessitates adherence to modernized guidelines and protocols.
  • Standardized outcome measures are critical for evaluating and integrating new and existing pain management strategies.
  • A holistic approach incorporating advanced analytical methods is needed to optimize thoracic pain relief services.

Related Experiment Videos