Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

High Throughput, Real-time, Dual-readout Testing of Intracellular Antimicrobial Activity and Eukaryotic Cell Cytotoxicity
Published on: November 16, 2016
Comparative safety of the different macrolides
1Infectious Diseases Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University School of Medicine, IL-52621 Tel-Hashomer, Israel. erubins@yahoo.com
Abstract:
The macrolides are generally well tolerated when used for the treatment of acute infections. Even when given long term for prophylaxis, there are few discontinuations due to side-effects. There are isolated reports of QT(c) prolongation in patients treated with erythromycin and other 14-membered-ring macrolides. Since the 14-membered-ring macrolides are metabolized by P450 isoenzymes, there is the potential for interaction with other therapeutic agents also metabolized in this way. Pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated interactions between either erythromycin or clarithromycin and cyclosporin, cisapride, pimozide, disopyramide, astemizole, carbamazepine, midazolam, digoxin, hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (i.e. 'statins') and warfarin. In patients receiving such concurrent therapy, azithromycin may be superior to erythromycin and clarithromycin.
Insights
Macrolide antibiotics are usually safe for infections and prophylaxis. However, some macrolides can interact with other drugs metabolized by P450 enzymes, potentially causing adverse effects.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
- Drug Interactions
Background:
- Macrolide antibiotics are frequently prescribed for acute infections and prophylaxis due to good tolerability.
- Potential side effects, though rare, include QT(c) prolongation with certain macrolides.
- Metabolism via P450 isoenzymes raises concerns for drug-drug interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the safety profile of macrolide antibiotics.
- To identify potential drug interactions associated with macrolide use.
- To compare the interaction potential of different macrolides, particularly azithromycin versus erythromycin and clarithromycin.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on macrolide antibiotic tolerability and side effects.
- Analysis of pharmacokinetic studies detailing interactions between macrolides and other medications.
- Comparison of metabolic pathways and interaction profiles of erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin.
Main Results:
- Macrolides exhibit a generally favorable safety profile with low discontinuation rates.
- Specific macrolides, like erythromycin, are associated with QT(c) prolongation.
- Significant pharmacokinetic interactions are documented between erythromycin/clarithromycin and numerous drugs (e.g., cyclosporin, statins, warfarin) metabolized by P450 enzymes.
Conclusions:
- While generally safe, macrolides carry a risk of QT(c) prolongation and significant drug interactions.
- Azithromycin may offer a safer alternative to erythromycin and clarithromycin in patients on concurrent therapy due to a potentially lower interaction profile.
- Careful consideration of concomitant medications is crucial when prescribing macrolides.
More Related Videos
09:17A Robust Pneumonia Model in Immunocompetent Rodents to Evaluate Antibacterial Efficacy against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii
Published on: January 2, 2017
07:50Assay Development for High-Throughput Drug Screening Against Mycobacteria
Published on: October 25, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Inhibitors of Bacterial Protein Synthesis
Inhibitors of Bacterial DNA Synthesis
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance