Related Experiment Videos
Screening for disability: a eugenic pursuit?
1Genetic Interest Group, London.
Journal of Medical Ethics
|September 28, 2001
Summary
Selective termination for fetal abnormalities is not inherently eugenic. Parental decisions involve complex factors beyond eugenics, focusing on their family
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Genetics
- Reproductive Medicine
Background:
- Debate surrounding selective termination for fetal abnormalities.
- Concerns about potential eugenic motivations.
- Need to clarify ethical considerations in genetic screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the motivations behind selective termination for fetal abnormalities.
- To differentiate between eugenic intent and parental decision-making.
- To examine the ethical implications of genetic counseling.
Main Methods:
- Philosophical analysis of ethical frameworks.
- Review of literature on genetic screening and termination.
- Exploration of humanist medicine principles.
Main Results:
- Selective termination decisions are often multifactorial, not solely eugenic.
- Parental choices reflect judgments about their own family's well-being.
- Genetic counseling for fetal abnormalities can contain directive elements.
Conclusions:
- Selective termination for fetal abnormalities can be ethically distinct from eugenics.
- Parental decisions are personal, relating to their child's future quality of life.
- Counseling practices require careful consideration of their inherent influence.
Keywords:
Genetics and Reproduction