Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Risk-based capital requirements may be a boon to capitation

    Capitation Management Report
    |October 2, 2001
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Capitation models remain viable, particularly when state regulations on risk-based capital requirements enhance their appeal. Explore the financial implications and strategic advantages of capitation in healthcare finance.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same journal

    Wellpoint, HealthNet and Prudential settle capitation lawsuit.

    Capitation management report·2006
    Same journal

    Medicaid programs turn to managed care and capitation to control costs.

    Capitation management report·2006
    Same journal

    HealthCare Partners works with hospitals to control utilization.

    Capitation management report·2006
    Same journal

    Advocate Health Care delivers quality under capitation.

    Capitation management report·2006
    Same journal

    Sharp uses integrated approach to stay profitably at-risk.

    Capitation management report·2006
    Same journal

    Physician use of EMRs varies depending on type of organization.

    Capitation management report·2006
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Finance
    • Health Economics
    • Health Policy

    Background:

    • Capitation models are a common reimbursement strategy in healthcare.
    • State-specific risk-based capital requirements can influence the financial viability of healthcare providers.
    • Understanding these regulatory impacts is crucial for financial planning.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To re-evaluate the attractiveness of capitation models in light of state-imposed risk-based capital requirements.
    • To analyze the financial implications of these regulatory demands on capitation.
    • To provide insights into the strategic financial considerations for healthcare organizations.

    Main Methods:

    • Financial modeling to assess capitation scenarios.
    • Analysis of state-specific risk-based capital regulations.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of financial outcomes under different regulatory environments.

    • Main Results:

    • State-imposed risk-based capital requirements can create favorable conditions for capitation.
    • The financial attractiveness of capitation is significantly influenced by regulatory capital demands.
    • Specific numerical outcomes demonstrate the impact of these requirements.

    Conclusions:

    • Capitation models should not be dismissed prematurely due to regulatory factors.
    • Risk-based capital requirements can enhance the financial feasibility of capitation.
    • Healthcare organizations should consider these regulatory dynamics in their financial strategies.