[How to determine the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in the elderly?]

The real prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is difficult to determine in the elderly because of the frequency of drug intake (antibiotics or anti-secretory drugs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of five tests in the elderly.

The study population consisted of consecutive patients undergoing a routine endoscopy between August 1998 and December 1999. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of four tests in all of the included patients: culture and histology of biopsy specimens, serology (ELISA) and urea breath test (13C-UBT). Detection of H. pylori antigens in stool samples (HpSA) was realized in a subgroup. Patients were considered H. pylori + when result for culture was positive or when two tests were positive.

One hundred and sixty-seven patients were included in this study (55 men, 112 women; mean age: 85.6 +/- 5.1 years). Only 38 (22.8%) patients were H. pylori+. Test performances showed the following results: serology sensitivity: 90.9% (IC 95%: 75.6-98.1) versus 86.9% (IC 95%: 63.6-96.9) for culture versus 77.8% (IC 95%: 60.8-89.9) for histology and 74.3% (IC 95%: 56.7-87.5) for 13C-UBT. Eighty-nine (53.3%) took antibiotics or anti-secretory drugs, only 13C-UBT performances decreased significantly (sensitivity: 94.4% [72.7-99.8] versus 52.9% [27.8-77]; P < 10(-6)). When gastric or duodenal ulcer were endoscopically diagnosed in older patients, both histology and 13C-UBT could not improve the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. HpSA was realized in 107 patients (sensitivity: 74.1%, specificity: 98.7%). We showed no statistical difference between HpSA performances and drug intake.

Diagnostic performances decreased in older patients especially because of drug intake.