Related Experiment Videos
Fecal elastase-1 determination: 'gold standard' of indirect pancreatic function tests?
S Lüth1, S Teyssen, K Forssmann
1Dept. of Medicine II (Gastroenterology/Hepatology), University Hospital of Heidelberg at Mannheim, Germany.
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
|October 9, 2001
Summary
Fecal elastase-1 is highly sensitive for diagnosing moderate to severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, outperforming fecal chymotrypsin. However, both stool tests show low specificity and are not ideal for screening.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Biochemistry
- Diagnostic Medicine
Background:
- Tubeless pancreatic function tests, including fecal elastase-1 and chymotrypsin, are utilized for diagnosing pancreatic exocrine insufficiency.
- These tests employ varying cut-off levels, leading to inconsistent diagnostic success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of fecal elastase-1 and chymotrypsin in assessing exocrine pancreatic insufficiency.
Main Methods:
- 127 patients with malassimilation signs underwent the secretin-caerulein test (gold standard), fecal fat analysis, fecal chymotrypsin activity, and fecal elastase-1 concentration.
- Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency was graded (mild, moderate, severe) based on secretin-caerulein test results.
- Fecal elastase-1 and chymotrypsin were measured using commercial kits with defined cut-off levels.
Main Results:
- Fecal elastase-1 demonstrated 100% sensitivity for severe and 89% for moderate exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (cut-off 200 microg/g), significantly higher than fecal chymotrypsin (76% and 47%, respectively).
- Specificities for both tests were low (elastase-1: 55%, chymotrypsin: 47%).
- Correlation between fecal enzyme levels and duodenal enzyme outputs was moderate (33-55% for elastase-1, 25-38% for chymotrypsin).
Conclusions:
- Fecal elastase-1 is a highly sensitive marker for moderate and severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, surpassing fecal chymotrypsin.
- Both tests exhibit low specificity, limiting their utility for general screening due to false positives in non-pancreatic patients.
- While useful for diagnosing insufficiency, neither test is a standalone screening tool.