Comparison of energy components of proteins from thermophilic and mesophilic organisms

In order to infer the energetic determinants of thermophilic proteins, molecular mechanics calculations were applied to five proteins from thermophilic eubacteria and their mesophilic homologs. The energy function includes a hydration term as well as the electrostatic contribution from the solvent in addition to the usual conformational energy terms. We calculated energy values for three different states of each protein: the native, near-native, and unfolded structures. The energy difference and its components between pairs of these states were compared. The hypothetical near-native structures have almost the same backbone conformation as the native structure but with largely distorted side-chain packing, thus enabling us to extract the energy components important for stabilizing the native backbone topology itself, irrespective of structural details. It was found that the sum of the electrostatic and hydration energies, although of large positive values, were consistently lower for the thermophilic proteins than for their mesophilic counterparts. This trend was observed in the energy difference not only between the native and unfolded structures, but also between the near-native and unfolded structures. In contrast, the energy components regarding side-chain packing did not show any clear tendency. These results suggest that the thermophilic proteins are stabilized so that the precise packing of the native structure does not significantly affect the stability. Implications of this conclusion are also discussed.