Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Time versus frequency domain techniques for assessing baroreflex sensitivity.

P B Persson1, M DiRienzo, P Castiglioni

  • 1Johannes-Müller Institut für Physiologie, Berlin, Germany. pontus.persson@charite.de

Journal of Hypertension
|October 11, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Plasma PCSK9 levels in children and adolescents: evidence from an Italian outpatient paediatric clinic cohort at cardio-metabolic risk.

Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD·2026
Same author

Right ventricular reserve in cardiopulmonary disease: A simultaneous hemodynamic and three-dimensional echocardiographic study.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·2024
Same author

Candidacy and long-term outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in current practice in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

International journal of cardiology·2024
Same author

A method to generate perfusable physiologic-like vascular channels within a liver-on-chip model.

Biomicrofluidics·2023
Same author

Fine particulate matter and sleep-disordered breathing severity in a large Italian cohort.

Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung·2023
Same author

Comparison of office, home and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in hypertensive and suspected hypertensive SWICOS participants.

Blood pressure·2023
Same journal

Explaining blood pressure reduction heterogeneity in sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor trials: a meta-analysis stratified by patient characteristics.

Journal of hypertension·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Feasibility of the extended, 48-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hemodialysis patients: a multicenter study.

Journal of hypertension·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Neurofibromatosis 2 alleviates ferroptosis and fibrosis in the aortas of spontaneously hypertensive rats through the Yes-associated protein pathway.

Journal of hypertension·2026
Same journal

Reply to comment: Limited public understanding of the risk factors and complications of hypertension.

Journal of hypertension·2026
Same journal

What magnesium depletion score can tell us about arterial stiffness.

Journal of hypertension·2026
Same journal

Nephron deficit as susceptibility, not determinism.

Journal of hypertension·2026
See all related articles

Newer methods for assessing baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) analyze blood pressure and heart rate data without invasive substances. These techniques offer comparable insights into BRS changes over time, especially when averaged.

Area of Science:

  • Physiology
  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) evaluation traditionally involved invasive methods.
  • Novel techniques analyze blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) time series.
  • These modern approaches avoid vasoactive substances and complex experimental setups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare the latest methods for assessing spontaneous baroreflex function.
  • To outline the basic features of emerging BRS assessment techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of blood pressure and heart rate time series.
  • Time and frequency domain signal processing.
  • Comparison of various signal processing schemes for BRS estimation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Modern BRS techniques utilize diverse signal processing schemes.
  • Respiration and non-stationary factors can influence estimates differently across methods.
  • Despite variations, techniques often yield comparable BRS information over time, particularly with averaged data.

Conclusions:

  • Most modern BRS assessment methods show agreement in patterns.
  • It is advisable to use the most validated techniques with available supporting data.
  • Consistent findings across studies support the reliability of current BRS evaluation approaches.